Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Beyond relational continuity

Patrick BM Burch
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (709): 347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X716537
Patrick BM Burch
University of Manchester, Manchester. Email:
Roles: GP and THIS Institute PhD Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: patrick.burch@manchester.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Beyond relational continuity
    Denis Pereira Gray, Kate Sidaway-Lee, Alex Harding and Philip H. Evans
    Published on: 10 August 2021
  • Published on: (10 August 2021)
    Page navigation anchor for Beyond relational continuity
    Beyond relational continuity
    • Denis Pereira Gray, Former GP Partner, Consultant, St Leonard's Practice, Exeter
    • Other Contributors:
      • Kate Sidaway-Lee, Research Fellow, St Leonard's Practice, Exeter
      • Alex Harding, GP partner, St Leonard's Practice, Exeter
      • Philip H. Evans, Former GP partner, St Leonard's Practice, Exeter

    We thank Dr Burch1 for his interest in our article and agree that the distinction between longitudinal and relational continuity is important.

    We are pleased that he too thinks that “relational continuity for patients in primary care….should be maximised wherever possible.” He is correct that others have included information and management continuity in the broad concept of continuity of general practitioner care. However, we prefer to separate these and believe that informational continuity is essentially good record-keeping and management continuity good practice and care plans. Of course, both of these are desirable but our article concerned “relational continuity.”

    The patients’ perception of having a deep (trusting) relationship with their GP has been reported by Ridd et al. (2011)2 linked to the number of consultations had with that GP. It shows a linear increase in the depth of the relationship up to eight consultations when there is a 50% probability of patients thinking they have a “deep” relationship with the GP concerned. We continue to think relational continuity is by far the most important part of continuity and is the main mechanism generating the important outcomes.3 It needs further study in a RCT of an intervention to improve continuity.

    We do not follow his point about general practice “as it is rather than how we...

    Show More

    We thank Dr Burch1 for his interest in our article and agree that the distinction between longitudinal and relational continuity is important.

    We are pleased that he too thinks that “relational continuity for patients in primary care….should be maximised wherever possible.” He is correct that others have included information and management continuity in the broad concept of continuity of general practitioner care. However, we prefer to separate these and believe that informational continuity is essentially good record-keeping and management continuity good practice and care plans. Of course, both of these are desirable but our article concerned “relational continuity.”

    The patients’ perception of having a deep (trusting) relationship with their GP has been reported by Ridd et al. (2011)2 linked to the number of consultations had with that GP. It shows a linear increase in the depth of the relationship up to eight consultations when there is a 50% probability of patients thinking they have a “deep” relationship with the GP concerned. We continue to think relational continuity is by far the most important part of continuity and is the main mechanism generating the important outcomes.3 It needs further study in a RCT of an intervention to improve continuity.

    We do not follow his point about general practice “as it is rather than how we would like to be”, as we very much study general practice as it is. Our earlier report4 Sidaway-Lee et al. (2019) reported the measured continuity in a group general practice with 9,000 patients over two years that was actually received by patients; 65% of all appointments made by patients aged 65 or over were with their personal GP despite all the GPs being part-time. Since then, we have learned of other practices where measured continuity of GP care is higher, and we have recently reported how it is also high in two other European countries.5

    References

    1. Burch PBM. Beyond relational continuity. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71; 347.
    2. Ridd MJ, Lewis G, Peters TJ, Salisbury C. Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale: Development and Validation. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9(6):538-545.
    3. Sidaway-Lee K, Pereira Gray D, Harding A, Evans P. What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes? Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:278-281.
    4. Sidaway-Lee K, Pereira Gray D, Evans P. A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 69 (682): e356-e362.
    5. Gray DP, Sidaway-Lee K, Evans P, Harding A. Measuring GP continuity at scale. Br J Gen Pract  2021; 71(707):255.
     
    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 71 (709)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 71, Issue 709
August 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Beyond relational continuity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Beyond relational continuity
Patrick BM Burch
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (709): 347. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X716537

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Beyond relational continuity
Patrick BM Burch
British Journal of General Practice 2021; 71 (709): 347. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X716537
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Author response
  • Ethnicity did not predict performance in GP licensing of doctors entering GP training
  • Short stature — what specific test should we request?
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242