Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Non-speculum sampling for cervical screening in older women

Lindsey M Wishart
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718313
Lindsey M Wishart
Email:
Roles: Accountant.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Lindsey.wishart@hotmail.co.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

All letters are subject to editing and may be shortened. General letters can be sent to bjgpdisc{at}rcgp.org.uk (please include your postal address for publication), and letters responding directly to BJGP articles can be submitted online via eLetters. We regret we cannot notify authors regarding publication.

For submission instructions visit: bjgp.org/letters

I just want to say thank you so much to the researchers, who have conducted a number of studies specifically looking into the barriers to screening faced by older women.1,2 The studies go back to 2012, and the same issues have come up time and again. It’s so obvious that this is a solution for women with vaginal atrophy, who often suffer extreme pain and trauma during speculum screening.

I was a victim of harm during sample taking, caused by a poorly trained and incompetent nurse, and was then let down by three GPs and a consultant gynaecologist. The aftermath of this has left me with long-term physical and psychological harm. It took months for the provider to acknowledge this was a notifiable safety incident. I have withdrawn my consent to screening as a result. I am not prepared to let anyone from the NHS put their hands on me again. But I would be prepared to do home sampling.

While we wait for non-speculum sampling to be rolled out, please can all practices make sure their sample takers know what to do to make older women more comfortable. You should ask women over 45 about symptoms of atrophy. Then you should suggest they get prescribed topical oestrogen for a few weeks. Then you should use the smallest speculum and copious lubricant. You should never use brute force. You also need to empower women, so they know what to expect. Both Jo’s Trust (https://www.jostrust.org.uk) and Menopause Support (https://menopausesupport.co.uk) have written good leaflets that should be given to all older women.

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Landy R,
    2. Hollingworth T,
    3. Waller J,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0350.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Castañón A,
    2. Landy R,
    3. Cuzick J,
    4. Sasieni P
    (2014) Cervical screening at age 50–64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study. PLoS Med 11, 1, e1001585.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-speculum sampling for cervical screening in older women
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Non-speculum sampling for cervical screening in older women
Lindsey M Wishart
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 58. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718313

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Non-speculum sampling for cervical screening in older women
Lindsey M Wishart
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 58. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718313
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An earlier diagnosis of heart failure
  • Group A strep: has point-of-care testing for primary care finally come of age?
  • Author response
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242