Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

What are GPs for, when the chips are down?

Nick Berry
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718373
Nick Berry
Nick is a GP in Dorset, England. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drgently@drgently.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

They say that today’s papers will wrap tomorrow’s chips, but that hasn’t actually been true since about 1981, when they realised the dyes in the ink were a little bit poisonous.

Chips or not, an article in the Financial Times recently caught my attention because it appeared to suggest that family doctors may no longer be needed.1

On one hand, this is truly excellent news. It means that tomorrow, rather than face the maelstrom of demand that usually accompanies each Monday morning, I can go fishing.

On the other hand — what on earth are they talking about?

The journalist, who is also a government advisor on health reform, wrote: ‘When my son hurt his back badly, I called three surgeries in a panic. Two didn’t answer, and the third told me to call 999.’And:‘If you’re repeatedly fobbed off, as one of my friends was this summer, you might end up in hospital with cancer — which is where she is now.’

Whoa, slow down there, and let’s read those somewhat emotive snippets again. Someone hurt their back and someone has cancer. These are bad things, and I’m sorry. Hopefully they are both getting better. But don’t we have purpose-built places where people can go to get fixed up when they have an accident, or an emergency? And wouldn’t the friend with cancer have needed hospital treatment anyway? It’s possible that I may not have grasped the full nettle of these anecdotes, but unless we are to start setting bones and delivering chemotherapy in our local surgeries, isn’t it entirely appropriate for hospitals to continue to do that sort of work?

Figure

‘It’s time to stand back and ask what GPs are for’, the piece then proclaims. Well, OK. Except, having framed this question, the author immediately gives us an answer that is completely wrong. They say the two roles of a GP are to be a trusted face and a gatekeeper to a rationed system.

That’s not it.

The role of a GP is, in fact, to deliver the vast majority of the country’s health care. Around 90% of all medical consultations take place in general practice, according to an often cited independent report by The King’s Fund.2

Your GP surgery is where you go when your newborn baby needs checking. When your toddler has a limp. When your child has asthma. When your teenager is cutting their arms.

Your GP is who you go to when you’ve found a lump. When your mother is forgetting things. When your grandfather, late in the day, is taking his final breaths.

TENDING UNCEASINGLY TO THE DIVERSE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF LOCAL PEOPLE IS THE JOB OF GPs

The system is far from perfect. There’s always room for improvement. Sometimes there aren’t enough people delivering care to match the demands of the people who need to receive it.

And recent swings towards bigger, scaled-up surgeries have presented a particular challenge to the relationships families have traditionally had with their doctors.

But surely this is what GPs are for. Around the country, working in partnerships and practices of every type, their mission is to tend unceasingly to the diverse healthcare needs of local people. And although this is rarely reported in the Sunday papers, there is evidence that they often do it rather well.

I wonder why someone might say otherwise. Could it be — and this is just a wild stab in the dark — because they are an advisor on health reform, and shaking things up a little goes with the job?

With this in mind, I retrieved a crumpled broadsheet from the bin outside the chip shop. Having carefully unfolded it, I found the article and more fully appraised the content. The proposal, it seems, is that GPs should be centrally employed to supervise ever bigger multiprofessional teams. Entrusted with the ration book. This might solve problems of access, workload, and fragmentation of care. Although to be honest, it was kind of smeared, and I couldn’t quite make out the part where it explained how.

I noticed though, that something smelled a little fishy, and took it with a pinch of salt.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 9 December 2021; https://bjgplife.com/chips

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cavendish C
    (Nov 12, 2021) It’s time to stand back and ask what GPs are for. Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/7819dc0c-b0c5-4ecd-82f1-e6ae5b1ddc7d (accessed 6 Jan 2022).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Goodwin N,
    2. Dixon A,
    3. Poole T,
    4. Raleigh V
    (2011) Improving the quality of care in general practice Report of an independent inquiry commissioned by The King’s Fund, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/improving-quality-of-care-general-practice-independent-inquiry-report-kings-fund-march-2011_0.pdf (accessed 6 Jan 2022).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What are GPs for, when the chips are down?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What are GPs for, when the chips are down?
Nick Berry
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 71. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718373

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
What are GPs for, when the chips are down?
Nick Berry
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 71. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718373
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • TENDING UNCEASINGLY TO THE DIVERSE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF LOCAL PEOPLE IS THE JOB OF GPs
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: 36 Hours
  • A world without general practice
  • SNOMED CT: working smarter, not harder
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242