Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

‘What about us?’ A pensioner’s perspective

Madge McClary
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718385
Madge McClary
Madge ‘at the age of 71’ is not yet fully retired and continues to work as a BMAT Part 3 Examiner for Cambridge Assessment and as an English Language teacher in Cambridge. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: madgemcclary@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Every one of us has a story. Some stories are happy, some more interesting than others, while many are complicated and chaotic at times, and some just plain tragic. With a bit of luck most stories only begin to end when we reach our declining years. At this point in someone’s story many of the achievements that were recognised in the early chapters are forgotten or deemed irrelevant. This is despite the fact that the final chapter is often a time when older people remain fit and active for much longer, and form the backbone of many charities and groups of volunteers.

Moreover, many of the ‘What about us?’ generation left school at 15 and have had a working life that spanned over four or five decades. Many continued to work past retirement age and some still do. In the 1960s, it was customary to have a Saturday job while still at school. At age 13, they would have started paying National Insurance and, even now in their seventies, many might not yet be fully retired and are still paying income tax on modest earnings and pensions: a whopping 50 or 60 years later.

FUNDING CARE FOR OLDER PEOPLE

Driven by statistics, political posturing, and speculation, the discrimination and prejudice against older people is cemented even further, a case in point being the current debate about health and social care funding. Warning the general public about how the percentage of older people in the population is set to rise, and issuing predictions concerning the increase in costs associated with caring for people who are living longer, adds more fuel to a growing level of resentment. Yet, there is little or no reference made to the tax revenue still being collected by HMRC, which would surely give a fairer and more realistic picture of the actual economic situation. Likewise, no one seems to challenge the costs of the bureaucracy involved at local, regional, and national level in administering the health and social care provision for older people in need.

Figure

In the meantime older people continue to be viewed merely as a financial burden on the state and consequently less worthwhile members of society — a society that is only too keen to draw attention to other areas of prejudice. There is a minefield of political correctness to navigate nowadays so as to avoid offending anyone and everyone, but such sensitivity by and large seems to exclude older people.

PREJUDICE

Older people get ‘tutted’ at for being too slow; treated with exasperation for being hard of hearing; mocked endlessly on YouTube for being forgetful or repeating themselves and for not being sufficiently ‘woke’ or tech savvy: the latter being a dangerous assumption to make. Our ‘arthritic’ fingers may not fly over the laptop keys or smartphone buttons as quickly as they once did, but we were at the forefront of the office and personal computer revolution in the 1970s and 1980s. We might choose not to subscribe to multimedia platforms and social media but that does not mean we are blissfully ignorant of the wide range of technology and its many and varied functions.

The older generation should not have to face the level and types of prejudice that are endemic in society, especially at a time when we inevitably become caught up in the health and social care system. On a recent visit to my GP’s practice I was summoned by my first name only and thereafter this was substituted by ‘dear’, and ‘sweetheart’, although those two expressions are infinitely more preferable than ‘my lovely’, or, worse still, ‘dearie’! I was not asked how I preferred to be addressed.

I recall one particular occasion when attending a hospital outpatient appointment. During the consultation with the specialist clinician, the manner in which I was spoken to was so patronising and insulting that I felt myself getting quite angry. I bit my tongue and instead looked carefully around the room. At which point I was asked what I was looking for. To which I replied, ‘The child you are talking to …’

Once we enter our seventies, we do not become children again and should not be treated as if we were. Neither should we face any form of discrimination or prejudice based on advanced age or declining physical condition, especially from the medical profession who are bound by the four prima facie principles of ‘respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice’.1

It is not unreasonable to expect a level of respect and consideration following a lifetime of work and contribution to the public purse. It is entirely reasonable to be allowed to enjoy a few years of well-earned retirement without the discrimination and prejudice that many are faced with in older age.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 15 Dec 2021; https://bjgplife.com/what

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    (1994) Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 309, 184, https://www.bmj.com/content/309/6948/184 (accessed 23 Dec 2021).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
‘What about us?’ A pensioner’s perspective
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
‘What about us?’ A pensioner’s perspective
Madge McClary
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 72. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718385

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
‘What about us?’ A pensioner’s perspective
Madge McClary
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 72. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718385
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • FUNDING CARE FOR OLDER PEOPLE
    • PREJUDICE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The many flavours of justice in primary care
  • Books: Frontline. Saving Lives in War, Disaster and Disease
  • Should there be preferential health care for healthcare workers?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242