Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Yonder: Reflective writing, prostate cancer, disaster preparedness, and Dutch and Chinese women’s body image

Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718421
Ahmed Rashid
GP and Clinical Associate Professor, UCL Medical School, UCL, London. Email: @Dr_A_Rashid
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ahmed.rashid@ucl.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Figure

Yonder: a diverse selection of primary care relevant research stories from beyond the mainstream biomedical literature

Reflective writing

Although the theoretical value of reflecting-on-action is clear, the clear dislike of exercises in written reflection by medical students and doctors of all levels of seniority raises questions about what value it truly adds. A research team from Keele recently completed a study that arose out of efforts to improve medical student engagement with a reflective writing exercise.1 Realist methodology was used to explain the disinclination of the majority to do written reflection on workplace feedback, and the benefits to the minority. Three summary theories emerged showing the importance of context. First, written reflection is effortful and benefits those who invest in it when they need to think more deeply about a learning event. Second, following a reflective feedback discussion, writing a reflection may add little because the learning has already taken place. Third, external motivation tends to result in writing a ‘tick-box’ reflection. The authors suggest that exercises in written reflection could be better targeted to need by being more student-led, both in timing and topic.

Prostate cancer

To better understand how men experience the diagnostic and treatment trajectory of prostate cancer over a longer period of time, a Dutch research team recently examined unsolicited voices of men themselves as written down in book-length illness autobiographies.2 As autobiographies are written over time, they can show how the present changes every day, including differences in experiences, feelings, and thoughts. Men described a relationship with their cancer that is fluid and fitful, and often depends on place, time, and circumstances. They also found that the ‘not knowing’ of prostate cancer creates uncertainty, which can take different forms, transcends time, and is shaped through medical technologies, continual testing, and disagreeing doctors.

Disaster preparedness

Registered nurses in disaster management roles such as disaster preparedness coordinators (DPCs) have a profound impact on patient safety and outcome during the urgent first medical response in a major incident. A recent Swedish study examined nurses’ experiences as DPCs at the time of the April 2017 Stockholm attack when a truck was deliberately driven into crowds in a shopping street.3 Gaining situational awareness was deemed important, including deciphering information and forming a hospital incident command group. Staff briefings and managing uncertainty were identified as key challenges, particularly as balancing staff across departments was, in hindsight, identified as critically important. Education and training based on realistic scenarios focusing on the command’s ability to reduce uncertainty were deemed worthwhile activities that could improve management skills and positively affect patient outcomes.

Dutch and Chinese women’s body image

Dutch society is typically considered individualistic, and ranks highly with respect to gender equity. In contrast, Chinese society is considered more collectivistic and male-oriented, underpinned by Confucian values, whereby women’s worth is valued in relation to men. Cosmetic surgery is becoming increasingly popular worldwide but the current literature is dominated by Western perspectives. A recent study sought to ‘cross-culturally’ explore Chinese and Dutch women’s attitudes towards cosmetic surgery.4 Women described sociocultural and intrapersonal factors as pro-surgery. Reasons against included psychological and health risks. Socioeconomic benefits of female beauty and attracting men were more salient among Chinese women. Chinese participants viewed ‘body appreciation’ as a promotor of cosmetic surgery as they conceptualised it as ‘self-love’, while Dutch participants saw it as a preventer as they conceptualised it as positivity about one’s body regardless of whether it meets societal beauty ideals.

Podcast of the month

The team at This American Life are excellent at finding drama in everyday life, curating true stories that are often funny, thought-provoking, and touching: https://www.thisamericanlife.org

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lefroy J,
    2. Walters B,
    3. Molyneux A,
    4. Smithson S
    (2021) Can learning from workplace feedback be enhanced by reflective writing? A realist evaluation in UK undergraduate medical education. Educ Prim Care 32, 6, 326–335.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. van der Kamp J,
    2. Betten AW,
    3. Krabbenborg L
    (2021) In their own words: a narrative analysis of illness memoirs written by men with prostate cancer. Sociol Health Illn doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13412.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Murphy JP,
    2. Hörberg A,
    3. Rådestad M,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Registered nurses’ experience as disaster preparedness coordinators during a major incident: a qualitative study. Nurs Open 9, 1, 329–338.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Mulkens S,
    3. Alleva JM
    (2021) Body image and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in China and the Netherlands: a qualitative study on cultural differences and similarities. Body Image 40, 30–49.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Yonder: Reflective writing, prostate cancer, disaster preparedness, and Dutch and Chinese women’s body image
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Yonder: Reflective writing, prostate cancer, disaster preparedness, and Dutch and Chinese women’s body image
Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 76. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718421

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Yonder: Reflective writing, prostate cancer, disaster preparedness, and Dutch and Chinese women’s body image
Ahmed Rashid
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 76. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718421
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Reflective writing
    • Prostate cancer
    • Disaster preparedness
    • Dutch and Chinese women’s body image
    • Podcast of the month
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The many flavours of justice in primary care
  • Books: Frontline. Saving Lives in War, Disaster and Disease
  • Should there be preferential health care for healthcare workers?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242