Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

The invisible GP

Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718433
Sati Heer-Stavert
Sati is a GP and Clinical Education Fellow at The University of Warwick. Email: @SatiHeerStavert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Sati.Heer-Stavert@warwick.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

A patient recently asked me when the practice was going to open again. I replied that I was, at that very moment, seeing them face-to-face in my consultation room. ‘I know,’ they replied, ‘but you know what I mean.’

In our media-infatuated world, the mere image of a general practice appearing closed holds more significance than whether it is truly open.1 The power of images in shaping public perceptions of health care is not a new phenomenon. In the UK, GPs in particular have inherited cultural legacies ranging from Fildes’ The Doctor through to Berger’s A Fortunate Man.2,3 However, the influence of our curated history is challenged by the number of images available today. In 2021, users of Facebook are estimated to have shared 240 000 photographs every minute.4 With a deluge of data, there is an incentive for users to selectively share items that attract attention rather than accurately conveying everyday realities. Medical imagery, when shared in such contexts, is often centred either on narrow spectrum, hard to access or high-cost interventions. Although these services are critical to the health needs of a select few patients, the saturation of modern medical imagery with technocratic motifs is a problem for healthcare systems where holistic generalists have a gatekeeper function. Such images provide wider society with repeated glimpses through the keyhole where the wizard works magic.5

IMPOSSIBLE HEROES

When patients are unknowingly enveloped by illusions, it is unsurprising that rare exceptions of care become routine expectations of care. Images are therefore more than what they simply record, they create a narrative. The emergence of global pandemic could have been an opportunistic juncture for the limits of atomistic medicine to be laid bare while showcasing a healthcare system operating in synergy. Instead, COVID-19 accelerated the trend of healthcare imagery to focus almost exclusively on hospital environments. At the time of writing, an internet image search for a ‘covid doctor’ did not yield an obvious photograph of a GP. Conspicuously absent from this modern exhibition, we are perceived as lazy, in hiding, or even irrelevant despite having a major role in the pandemic response. The experiences of GPs throughout this period are testimony enough but the injustice of this algorithmic verdict is inflamed by the knowledge that GPs have had the highest risk for COVID-19 deaths among doctors.6

Figure

However, it is still too early to know what images will eventually be remembered for encapsulating COVID-19. There is no obvious equivalent to the iconic plague doctor. Yet, emerging themes do offer an insight into how our pandemic doctors will be envisioned by posterity. The face mask is perhaps the most common motif but its meaning continues to change as the pandemic progresses. Considered a symbol of medical science by many, oppression by others, and concerningly both by some, it is an item that has become overtly politicised like health care itself.7

Cosmopolitan and patriotic sentiments are also often invoked, with staff sometimes seen supporting the globe like Atlas or embracing geographical representations of individual countries. Second World War posters have been refashioned to show frontline health workers wearing PPE. Healthcare heroism is symbolised with murals depicting staff with angelic wings or wearing superhero costumes. A closer look at the photographs of mask-wearing healthcare staff reveals that very few actually appear to be working in primary care. Often they are surrounded by the high-technology paraphernalia of intensivist care. Patients are attached to wires, tubes, and in some cases an oxygen canister supplants the position of the bedside relative. This is no GP home visit. The images of the pandemic reveal the doctor–patient interaction as augmented, distracted, or even superseded by the idea of impossible heroes or a technology–patient relationship. In this vision of superhuman COVID-19 doctors, GPs have been bestowed the power of invisibility. The fantasy land of images does not acknowledge an individual’s actions if they are not recorded and shared.

One of the facets of the existential crisis facing general practice is that of identity, and the profession must consider exerting agency over the pandemic story through powerful images. As it stands, it feels as if GPs have been judged in pseudo-absentia.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 31 December 2021; https://bjgplife.com/invisible

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Heer-Stavert S
    (2020) Spectacular health care. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712841.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Moore J
    (2008) What Sir Luke Fildes’ 1887 painting The Doctor can teach us about the practice of medicine today. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X279571.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Feder G
    (2005) A Fortunate Man: still the most important book about general practice ever written. Br J Gen Pract 55, 512, 246–247.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Knight S
    (Sep 30, 2022) Visualizing a minute on the internet in 2021. Techspot, https://www.techspot.com/news/91513-visualizing-minute-internet-2021.html (accessed 11 Jan 2022).
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mathers N,
    2. Hodgkin P
    (1989) The Gatekeeper and the Wizard: a fairy tale. BMJ 298, 6667, 172–174.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bandyopadhyay S,
    2. Baticulon RE,
    3. Kadhum M,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Infection and mortality of healthcare workers worldwide from COVID-19: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 5, 12, e003097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ike JD,
    2. Bayerle H,
    3. Logan RA,
    4. Parker RM
    (2020) Face masks: their history and the values they communicate. J Health Commun 25, 12, 990–995.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The invisible GP
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The invisible GP
Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718433

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The invisible GP
Sati Heer-Stavert
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 77. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718433
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • IMPOSSIBLE HEROES
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Yonder: HFpEF, amputees, professional identity formation, and leadership training
  • Manufacturing doctors is one thing; sustaining working communities is quite another
  • Junior doctors leaving the NHS: what would it mean for general practice?
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242