Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Analysis

Implementing point-of-care CRP testing for better diagnosis of acute respiratory infections

Andrew St. John, Rogier Hopstaken, Rosy Tirimacco, Ralph Audehm and Christopher P Price
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 87-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X718517
Andrew St. John
Drajon Health, Perth, Western Australia; Director, Australian Point-of-Care Testing Practitioners Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Roles: Consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rogier Hopstaken
Star-Shl Diagnostic Centres, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosy Tirimacco
Integrated Cardiovascular Clinical Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Roles: Operations & Research Manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph Audehm
Carlton Family Medical, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher P Price
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Honorary Senior Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

Many countries in Europe have routinely implemented the use of point-of-care testing (POCT) for c-reactive protein (CRP) in primary care to guide antibiotic therapy in patients with acute respiratory infections; however, this has not been implemented in the UK or Australia. General practice is where the majority of antibiotics are prescribed and CRP testing may provide a means to help limit antibiotic use to those patients with severe (bacterial) infections. A recent addition to this debate is whether the arguments to measure CRP rapidly also need to be applied to COVID-19 testing.

The clinical evidence to support CRP POCT to guide antibiotic therapy in adult patients was recently reviewed by Cals and Ebell. They concluded that in adults there is accumulating evidence that CRP use can help safely reduce antibiotic usage in patients with acute respiratory infections.1 A recent narrative review by Cooke et al queried why the test is not more widely used in the UK.2

Given the extent of the evidence base, the issue becomes one of identifying the remaining barriers to implementation and how they can be addressed.

WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION OF CRP POCT?

The most commonly identified barrier is how to fund or reimburse POCT CRP.3 Funding is in part related to the economic impact of testing. Both a budget impact model of POCT compared with normal care4 and a decision modelling study that compared both POCT alone and POCT plus communication skills training with normal care5 showed only that POCT was marginally cost-effective, but there was considerable uncertainty around the results. However, neither of these studies took into account the long-term benefits of antibiotic stewardship, although how this can be accounted for is acknowledged to be difficult. An additional …

View Full Text

  RCGP login

Members, please Login at RCGP to access the journal online

  Subscriber login

Enter your BJGP login information below.

Log in using your username and password

Enter your British Journal of General Practice username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

  Subscribe

Subscribe to the Journal - Subscribe to the print and/or online journal.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (715)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 715
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implementing point-of-care CRP testing for better diagnosis of acute respiratory infections
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Implementing point-of-care CRP testing for better diagnosis of acute respiratory infections
Andrew St. John, Rogier Hopstaken, Rosy Tirimacco, Ralph Audehm, Christopher P Price
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 87-88. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718517

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Implementing point-of-care CRP testing for better diagnosis of acute respiratory infections
Andrew St. John, Rogier Hopstaken, Rosy Tirimacco, Ralph Audehm, Christopher P Price
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (715): 87-88. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X718517
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION OF CRP POCT?
    • WHAT IS THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF CRP POCT?
    • NEXT STEPS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Constipation in autistic people and people with learning disabilities
  • Lesser-known types of violence: helping professionals to signal and act
  • How can GPs get people moving more?
Show more Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242