Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Southgate’s sign

Peter Toon
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): 225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X719321
Peter Toon
Peter is a retired GP, writer, and virtue ethicist. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: petertoon@aol.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

THE ETHICS OF THE ORDINARY

When you are with a patient and you get a sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach, accompanied by a wish that you were somewhere else, you are probably facing an ethical problem. This link was pointed out to me by a friend and colleague Dame Lesley Southgate about 30 years ago, when we were teaching ethics to medical students together. Since as far as I know she was the first person to point out this association, I have dubbed it ‘Southgate’s sign’.

CULTIVATING EMOTIONS

Balint taught GPs and others that a clinician’s feelings can be an important guide to what is going on.1 Patients may present problems in terms of physical symptoms, but the clinician may experience frustration, anxiety, sadness, or a sense of being trapped, which reflect emotions the patient is feeling but not aware of, or is unable or unwilling to express. The link may not be a simple mirroring; for example, many clinicians have observed that depressed patients make them feel angry, rather than depressed. Sometimes feelings may flag up distractions, as when we realise that we dislike a patient because she reminds us of an unpleasant older relative.

In our post-Enlightenment world we tend to think of ethical problems in rational terms; most basically applying the four principles of Beauchamp and Childress,2 or (if we are more sophisticated) analysing situations in terms of rights and duties or the consequences of our actions. But feelings are relevant too. Virtue ethics teaches us that emotions are important motivations that can not only help us to do what is right, but also lead us to do wrong, so we need to learn how to cultivate and direct them aright.

Recently in a moving account of a decision she had to make when her mother was dying, Greenhalgh3 showed that sometimes our feelings can show us what we must do, even though we may do it with regret for what we cannot do.4 I have previously used the term ‘tabloid ethics’ to describe the media’s focus on moral issues where our society is deeply divided, such as abortion and end-of-life care; and on issues that arise because of recent advances in medical technology, such as genetic engineering or genome sequencing.5 These situations clearly involve ethical problems, and we naturally start thinking consciously about the morality of what we are doing.

Figure

Dame Lesley Southgate, by Christian Furr, RCGP Heritage Collection.

FACTS AND VALUES ARE ENTWINED

There are also situations which aren’t so controversial and where what we should do is clear but not easy; for example, when someone asks about a relative’s health when that patient has not consented for confidential medical information to be shared. These situations may well elicit ‘Southgate’s sign’, in which case it is alerting us that our virtues — what Nussbaum and Sen called the personal qualities we need to face life’s challenges6 — are about to be exercised. But sometimes these sensations alert us to an ethical difficulty we may not have immediately perceived. Facts and values are intimately entwined in clinical decision making,7 and it is easy to confuse uncertainty about facts with uncertainty about values. This is why Southgate’s sign is relevant to a discussion of the Ethics of the Ordinary, because one of the features of ordinary ethical issues is that they are not always perceived as such.

Medical certification is an area of the Ethics of the Ordinary I have explored in some depth. The opening gambit ‘I need a note, doctor’8 often elicits Southgate’s sign. Sometimes there is uncertainty about the facts; do I actually know enough about what this person’s work involves and how their illness affects their ability to do it to make a judgement as to their fitness? But more often there is a moral uncertainty reflected in ‘Southgate’s sign’. How does my responsibility to be truthful fit with my responsibilities to the patient? Am I being asked to make a judgement I am in fact qualified to make? What, if any, are my responsibilities to the third party requesting a medical certificate?

This is just one area of practice where attention to feelings will alert clinicians to the Ethics of the Ordinary. If readers pay attention to their own experiences of discomfort, if they identify ‘Southgate’s sign’, then no doubt they will find many other issues that it will be appropriate to discuss in this column.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 9 Mar 2022; https://bjgplife.com/Southgate

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Salinsky J,
    2. Sackin P
    (2000) What are you feeling, doctor? Identifying and avoiding defensive patterns in the consultation (CRC Press, Abingdon).
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gillon R
    (1994) Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 309, 184.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Greenhalgh P
    (2021) Moral uncertainty: a case study of Covid-19. Patient Educ Couns 104, 11, 2643–2647.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hursthouse R
    (1991) Virtue theory and abortion. Philos Public Aff 20, 3, 223–246.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Papanikitas A,
    2. Toon P
    (2011) Primary care ethics: a body of literature and a community of scholars? J R Soc Med 104, 3, 94–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nussbaum M,
    2. Sen A
    (1993) The quality of life (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Toon PD
    (1981) Defining ‘disease’ — classification must be distinguished from evaluation. J Med Ethics 7, 4, 197–201.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Toon PD
    (2009) Practice pointer. ‘I need a note, doctor’: dealing with requests for medical reports about patients. BMJ 338, b175.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (718)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 718
May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Southgate’s sign
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Southgate’s sign
Peter Toon
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): 225. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X719321

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Southgate’s sign
Peter Toon
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): 225. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X719321
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • THE ETHICS OF THE ORDINARY
    • CULTIVATING EMOTIONS
    • FACTS AND VALUES ARE ENTWINED
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Where is the sales pitch for NHS primary care careers?
  • Women at the heart of general practice: the exhibition curator’s view
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242