Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice

Trisha Greenhalgh, Emma Ladds, Gemma Hughes, Lucy Moore, Joseph Wherton, Sara E Shaw, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Sietse Wieringa, Rebecca Rosen, Alexander Rushforth and Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): e351-e360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658
Trisha Greenhalgh
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Ladds
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: NIHR in-practice fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gemma Hughes
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Health services researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Moore
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Health services researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Wherton
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Health services researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara E Shaw
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Associate professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chrysanthi Papoutsi
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Roles: Senior researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sietse Wieringa
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Roles: GP academic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Rosen
Nuffield Trust, London, UK.
Roles: Senior policy analyst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Rushforth
Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Roles: Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Roles: Postdoctoral researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Why do GPs rarely improve their information technology skills?
    Pablo Millares Martin
    Published on: 22 May 2022
  • Published on: (22 May 2022)
    Page navigation anchor for Why do GPs rarely improve their information technology skills?
    Why do GPs rarely improve their information technology skills?
    • Pablo Millares Martin, GP, Whitehall Surgery

    The article by Greenhalgh1 provides some analysis on the use of video-consultation in general practice, but there are two main things to be considered that are not part of their assessment:

    It is implied NHS England was looking for video adoption in general practice as part of the pandemic when actually, there have been considerable efforts to improve the use of information technology (IT) in general practice, not only facilitating remote consultations by video but also through e-consulations, through interactions by e-mail and web-forms on practices websites. It was part of the Prime Minister Challenge Fund2 although it was linked also to the provision of extended access outside normal hours of practice.

    The second important issue, and related to the above, is the fact that general practice does not seem to engage sufficiently with IT advancements. Unfortunately, clinicians seem to have very little appetite to expand their medical knowledge to other areas that could facilitate their own work. It is not only about facilitating access using other forms of communication, which is always feared as a source of increased workload, but it is about the use of the electronic health records, the Problem Lists and the clinical coding so when patients are seen by others who know them less, they can get a clear picture of the person they are dealing with. Furthermore, embedded clinical decision tools that could be used in the clinical so...

    Show More

    The article by Greenhalgh1 provides some analysis on the use of video-consultation in general practice, but there are two main things to be considered that are not part of their assessment:

    It is implied NHS England was looking for video adoption in general practice as part of the pandemic when actually, there have been considerable efforts to improve the use of information technology (IT) in general practice, not only facilitating remote consultations by video but also through e-consulations, through interactions by e-mail and web-forms on practices websites. It was part of the Prime Minister Challenge Fund2 although it was linked also to the provision of extended access outside normal hours of practice.

    The second important issue, and related to the above, is the fact that general practice does not seem to engage sufficiently with IT advancements. Unfortunately, clinicians seem to have very little appetite to expand their medical knowledge to other areas that could facilitate their own work. It is not only about facilitating access using other forms of communication, which is always feared as a source of increased workload, but it is about the use of the electronic health records, the Problem Lists and the clinical coding so when patients are seen by others who know them less, they can get a clear picture of the person they are dealing with. Furthermore, embedded clinical decision tools that could be used in the clinical software are entirely dependent on the accuracy of coded entries, not on the favoured old fashioned free text.

    Education of new GPs is faulty, is dependent on trainers attached to the past, not willing to commit to new ways of working, and in consequence, the situation is going to remain unchanged and unchallenged unless more drastic actions are taken.

    References
    1. Greenhalgh T, Ladds E, Hughes G et al . Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72(718):e351-60.
    2. NHS England. About wave two pilots. Primary Care 2.0 - West Leeds. 2015. www.england.nhs.uk/gp/improving-access/gp-access-fund/wave-two/pilots/#24.
     
    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (718)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 718
May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice
Trisha Greenhalgh, Emma Ladds, Gemma Hughes, Lucy Moore, Joseph Wherton, Sara E Shaw, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Sietse Wieringa, Rebecca Rosen, Alexander Rushforth, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): e351-e360. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice
Trisha Greenhalgh, Emma Ladds, Gemma Hughes, Lucy Moore, Joseph Wherton, Sara E Shaw, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Sietse Wieringa, Rebecca Rosen, Alexander Rushforth, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (718): e351-e360. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • PERCS framework
  • primary care
  • qualitative research
  • remote consultation
  • telephone consultations
  • video consultations

More in this TOC Section

  • Introducing genetic testing with case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: qualitative study of patient and health professional experience
  • Impact of COVID-19 on primary care contacts with children and young people in England: longitudinal trends study 2015–2020
  • Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242