Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Research Paper of the Year 2021: relevant to training and beyond

Carolyn Chew-Graham and Helen Leach
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 384-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X720317
Carolyn Chew-Graham
School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele; Chair, RCGP Research Paper of the Year.
Roles: Professor of General Practice Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Leach
Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick University, Coventry. Email:
Roles: Academic Clinical Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: helen.leach@warwick.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The Research Paper of the Year (RPY), awarded by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), gives recognition to an individual or group of researchers who have undertaken and published an exceptional piece of research relating to general practice or primary care. The three categories are Clinical Research, Health Services Research (including implementation and public health) and Medical Education with relevance to primary care. Papers are scored on the criteria of originality, impact, contribution to the reputation of general practice, scientific approach, and presentation.

OVERALL WINNER: CLINICAL RESEARCH

For RPY 2021, we received 50 submissions — some truly excellent papers. The overall winner of the RPY award 2021 was from category 1 (Clinical Research): Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care in England (ARTIC PC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.1

This study was led by Paul Little from the University of Southampton, and demonstrated that amoxicillin for uncomplicated chest infections in children is unlikely to be clinically effective either overall or for key subgroups in whom antibiotics are commonly prescribed. The authors conclude that unless pneumonia is suspected, clinicians should not prescribe antibiotics for most children presenting with chest infections. The authors emphasise the need for safety-netting advice — encouraging parents to monitor their child and provide advice about when to consult again.

The reviewing panel reflected that not only was this a very well conducted trial, which will impact on clinicians’ behaviour, it linked with the key role primary care must play in antibiotic stewardship. GP trainees will need to learn to manage uncertainty and risk, and become confident in safety netting.2

TWO HIGHLY-COMMENDED PAPERS

Two papers were highly commended by the panel judging category 1 papers: Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study.3 This database study demonstrated increased risks of vascular and haematological events leading to hospital admission or death for a short time after first doses of the ChAdOx1, nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines. The risks of such events were substantially higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This paper has a really important public health message that can be used as evidence by primary care clinicians in conversations with people who are vaccine-hesitant.

Maintenance or discontinuation of antidepressants in primary care .4 This trial demonstrated that among patients recruited from general practices who felt well enough to discontinue antidepressant therapy, those who were assigned to stop their medication had a higher risk of relapse of depression by 52 weeks than those who were assigned to maintain their current antidepressant prescription. The lesson from this trial is that people on antidepressants should be reviewed regularly by GPs with a discussion about whether to continue medication.

A GP needs to feel comfortable discussing the risk of relapse of depression with a patient when considering reducing and withdrawing an antidepressant. This study provides evidence to inform that discussion.

WINNER OF CATEGORY 2: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (INCLUDING IMPLEMENTATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH)

The winner of category 2 was another trial: Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial.5 The trial demonstrated that offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling substantially increases uptake in older, lapsed attendee women. Non-speculum clinician sampling appeals to women who dislike the speculum but still prefer a clinician to take their sample. Providing a choice of screening modality may be important for optimising cervical screening uptake.

GP trainees may have little contact with women attending for cervical smears, which are largely done by practice nurses, but they may speak to women opportunistically and in postnatal checks, so being aware of the choices available is key to offering advice to women.

WINNER OF CATEGORY 3: MEDICAL EDUCATION WITH RELEVANCE TO PRIMARY CARE

The winner of category 3 was the paper: Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment: cross-sectional data linkage study.6 This study provided early evidence that the Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was a feasible alternative to the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) during the COVID-19 pandemic, but also shows areas for improvement. This paper reflects the earliest modifications of the exam, and changes have certainly been made since then to reflect day-to-day practice. The RCA is not without its criticism, but this paper demonstrates that it was a pragmatic replacement for the CSA at the height of the pandemic. The introduction of the RCA has arguably had the largest impact on GP trainees over the last 2 years. Further work is required to establish whether there are any issues surrounding differential attainment, particularly for less-than-full-time (LTFT) ethnic minorities or international medical graduates.7 The RCA will need to evolve to reflect the rapidly changing face of delivering primary care and consider whether its current model reflects the ability of trainees to undertake the role of a qualified GP.

IT IS VITAL THAT GP TRAINEES ENGAGE WITH RESEARCH

For many trainees, keeping up with research in primary care may fall last on a list of priorities that is overwhelmingly populated by mandatory portfolio entries or exams. However, these winning and commended papers contain relevant learning for GP trainees of all stages as they cover the breadth of the curriculum for both competencies and clinical topics.

It is vital to encourage GP trainees to engage with research, not least for clinical updates, but also to support their development in areas such as managing risk, shared decision making, and dealing with uncertainty. Trainees can also use the emerging evidence from trials such as ARTIC PC1 to empower patients to make decisions within primary care consultations. Equally, we should highlight research that, on face value, may not look as relevant. While trainees may not be directly involved in cervical smears, for example, they should opportunistically be participating in health promotion and demonstrating this within their portfolio.

We hope that you will (re-)read the winning papers and reflect on how research carried out in general practice informs our clinical decision making and supports us to deliver evidence-based care to our patients.

We must encourage GP trainees to acquire and use current evidence, and that they can demonstrate this in their MRCGP.

We can all support trainees by signposting them to WiseGP,8 an initiative supported by the RCGP, the Society for Academic Primary Care, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research School for Primary Care Research. Winners of the RPY award are encouraged to submit GEMS (General practice Evidence for Modern day practice) to the WiseGP website, and you will find previous years’ winners at https://www.wisegp.co.uk/gem-library.

The call for RPY 2022 will be out in the summer — please do submit a paper you feel has impacted on your clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

The RPY award is well supported by RCGP staff in Policy, Research and Campaigns. Thank you to all panel members and chairs involved in the process for giving of their time, particularly with all the competing demands on us.

Footnotes

  • This article was first posted on BJGP Life on 6 July 2022; https://bjgplife.com/RPY21

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Little P,
    2. Francis NA,
    3. Stuart B,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care in England (ARTIC PC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 398, 10309, 1417–1426.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Edwards PJ,
    2. Bennett-Britton I,
    3. Ridd MJ,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Factors affecting the documentation of spoken safety-netting advice in routine GP consultations: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0195.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hippisley-Cox J,
    2. Patone M,
    3. Mei XW,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study. BMJ 374, n1931.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lewis G,
    2. Marston L,
    3. Duffy L,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Maintenance or discontinuation of antidepressants in primary care. N Engl J Med 385, 14, 1257–1267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Landy R,
    2. Hollingworth T,
    3. Waller J,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0350.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Botan V,
    2. Laparidou D,
    3. Phung V-H,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment: cross-sectional data linkage study. Educ Prim Care 33, 1, 32–40.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bostock N
    (May 12, 2021) ‘Perfectly good trainees’ lost as revamped GP exam deepens inequality, LMCs warn. GP Online, https://www.gponline.com/perfectly-good-trainees-lost-revamped-gp-exam-deepens-inequality-lmcs-warn/article/1715778 (accessed 13 Jul 2022).
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wise GP
    About us. https://www.wisegp.co.uk/about (accessed 13 Jul 2022).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (721)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 721
August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Research Paper of the Year 2021: relevant to training and beyond
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research Paper of the Year 2021: relevant to training and beyond
Carolyn Chew-Graham, Helen Leach
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 384-385. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X720317

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research Paper of the Year 2021: relevant to training and beyond
Carolyn Chew-Graham, Helen Leach
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 384-385. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X720317
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • OVERALL WINNER: CLINICAL RESEARCH
    • TWO HIGHLY-COMMENDED PAPERS
    • WINNER OF CATEGORY 2: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (INCLUDING IMPLEMENTATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH)
    • WINNER OF CATEGORY 3: MEDICAL EDUCATION WITH RELEVANCE TO PRIMARY CARE
    • IT IS VITAL THAT GP TRAINEES ENGAGE WITH RESEARCH
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The Last King of Scotland: using film to explore our understanding of professionalism
  • Medical education and war in Ukraine
  • Where I end and you begin: additional roles in British general practice
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242