Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Books: Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist

Why it’s so Hard to be a Good Global Citizen in the 21st Century

Ivy Mitchell and Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 392-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X720401
Ivy Mitchell
Ivy is a student at James Madison University in the US. She is studying health policy on the OPUS programme at the University of Oxford. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mitcheie@dukes.jmu.edu
Andrew Papanikitas
Andrew is deputy editor of the @gentlemedic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Kate Raworth Penguin, 2018, PB, 384pp, £10.99, 978-1847941398
Figure

Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics is concerned with the question at the heart of economics: not only what to do about scarcity, but also with an equally profound basis for economics (attributed to the ancient Greek writer Xenophon no less!) — how to budget for a household. The household here is all of human society within the finite limits of planet earth. Raworth conceives of the problem as a doughnut (the American kind with a hole in the middle). The inner ring represents the needs of humanity. The outer ring represents the limits of human interference that the planet can sustain without damage. How might we ensure that, in a world of limited resources, every person has enough (the inner ring)? An economy existing outside of this ‘social foundation’ ring for all its people would signal that those goods are properly distributed and that the economy meets basic human needs of the individuals who live in it. However, Raworth’s model is concerned beyond the human needs hence the ring aimed at addressing planetary needs. This ecological ceiling signifies the rates of consumption that our planet can support. Staying within the outer ring is sustainable for the planet overall. An economy must exist in the area in-between the two rings if humanity is to flourish: fulfilling human needs while still satisfying the planetary needs. It is a delicate balance; we cannot meet our basic human rights without stress on the planet, but overconsumption results in unnecessary stress on the environment. Raworth aims for a dramatic reframing of economics, throwing out the neoliberal (free markets take care of themselves) thinking that historically dominates the discipline. For Raworth, the tools of economics are not only flawed (the models are influenced by physics and engineering rather than biological systems), but also ill suited in addressing the issues of climate change and distribution. Measures for economic success are often centred around growth, whether it be gross domestic product (GDP) or price measures such as the consumer price index (CPI). Raworth deems both unfit. Instead, she opts to base economics in the state of human and planetary wellbeing, arguing for measures of balance rather than growth.

REWRITING ECONOMICS

We find it impossible to overstate how important this last element of Raworth’s work is. The rewriting of economics from a picture of success defined by growth to one shaped by balance within a fragile ecosystem requires adoption of a mindset that is alien to classical economics. It may not be quite so alien to the 21st-century reader, whether they be a student of social policy or a family doctor. In the past century, we have asked a great deal of economics. In particular, we ignore health inequalities, environmental pollution, and gender equality. Despite the active role these aspects play in our economy, popular indicators of economic success do nothing to effectively measure their importance in our lives. If we cannot properly visualise the problem, we have no effective way of solving it. Solutions such as carbon taxing and the subsidisation of green energy have gained some traction in the lessening of the impacts of climate change.

Yet these policies are aimed at quantifying our environment within a practical value system so that it might fit within the existing economic system. This and simple welfare policies are nothing without the behavioural shift required to decide that; yes, our environment is worth something; yes, affordable care for all is worth something; or yes, the work of homemakers and others whose value to society GDP fails to capture is worth something.

Raworth argues that growth should not be the ultimate goal for a thriving economy. The shift in mindset that she advocates revolutionises how we think about economic success. The very idea that it might be possible to expand our rate of consumption indefinitely without consideration for the limits of resources or the effect on others’ wellbeing and the environment (economists call such factors externalities when they do not feature in transactional costs) is a simple matter of hubris — an act of arrogance that precedes disaster. Anyone can understand the reality behind the limits of consumption, so why do we continue to define success by this myth? Balance between the wellbeing of individuals and the planet is a much better indicator of how the economy is doing.

HOW DO YOU ACHIEVE A HEALTHY ECONOMY?

Raworth’s quite revolutionary model (no pun intended) can come across as simplistic. By contrast, she urges economists, policymakers, and citizens alike to think of the world in a more complex manner. For instance, the poorest people of every economy clearly exist on the inside of the social foundation ring. They are also harmed by activities that go outside of the environmental ceiling. For example, individuals on a low income around the world live in environments affected by pollution and other environmental damage resulting from the demand for consumer goods by the wealthy. Somehow it is also hard to compute that even in affluent societies there is inequality such that individuals are outside the doughnut. Is this a problem with the model or with society? Trying to think on a global and a local scale with consideration of human needs and desires, as well as the effects of meeting these while offering alternative goals for economies, is itself disorientating and difficult. Raworth’s new ideas in economics ‘dance on the page together’ but we are left thinking that ‘Doughnut Economics: the well-choreographed musical’ is a life’s work.

Raworth hits on the largest issues in the way of achieving a healthy economy, readily invalidating the pedestal on which we have placed the one-dimensional measurement of GDP. This is mirrored on a smaller scale by the way many small businesses aspire to become big businesses. Raworth is a testament for the need to progress our economic thinking. Time has changed and we need new tools if we are to think like 21st-century economists and behave as 21st-century citizens.

Footnotes

  • This review was first posted on BJGP Life on 21 March 2022; https://bjgplife.com/doughnut

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2022
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (721)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 721
August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Books: Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Books: Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
Ivy Mitchell, Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 392-393. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X720401

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Books: Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist
Ivy Mitchell, Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): 392-393. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X720401
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REWRITING ECONOMICS
    • HOW DO YOU ACHIEVE A HEALTHY ECONOMY?
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Where I end and you begin: additional roles in British general practice
  • Yonder #100: Nasal sprays, obstetric ultrasound, binge eating disorder, and emergency departments
  • Virtuoso general practice
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242