Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women

Rebecca Landy, Tony Hollingworth, Jo Waller, Laura AV Marlow, Jane Rigney, Thomas Round, Peter D Sasieni and Anita WW Lim
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): e538-e545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0708
Rebecca Landy
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, US.
Roles: Research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony Hollingworth
Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.
Roles: Consultant in obstetrics and gynaecology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Waller
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Reader in cancer behavioural science
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura AV Marlow
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Senior research associate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Rigney
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Epidemiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Round
School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Academic clinical fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter D Sasieni
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Professor of cancer prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita WW Lim
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Roles: Senior research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A flow chart for study participants in the routine screening population and colposcopy population.

    aThe two women with borderline cytology were HPV negative and are, therefore, not included in the colposcopy population; the third woman had inadequate cytology. CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. HPV = human papillomavirus.

Tables

  • Figures
  • How this fits in

    Speculum use is a significant barrier to cervical screening and can become particularly uncomfortable after the menopause. Self-sampling is an obvious solution but does not appeal to all women. Having a doctor or nurse take a sample without a speculum is another possibility, but test performance has not yet been examined. HPV testing on non-speculum clinician-taken samples was found to have comparable test performance with self-sampling, representing a promising new approach to cervical screening.
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Descriptive characteristics of the routine-screening population and colposcopy population participants

    Characteristicn%
    Routine-screening population
    Age, years
      50–545526.8
      55–598139.5
      60–646933.7
    Menopausal statusa
      Pre-menopausal52.7
      Peri-menopausal94.9
      Post-menopausal15082.4
      Not reported/unknown189.9
    Colposcopy population
    Age, years
      35–491315.7
      50–543339.8
      55–592226.5
      60–701518.1
    Reason for referral population study eligibility
      Confirmed CIN2+ on biopsy1518.1
      Moderate dyskaryosis on cytology910.8
      Severe dyskaryosis on cytology44.8
      HPV triageb5566.3
    Age of women with CIN2+, years
      35–49527.8
      50–54633.3
      55–59316.7
      60–70422.2
    • ↵a Derived from questionnaire data, therefore, the total number of women is 182.

    • ↵b Mild dyskaryosis or borderline changes and HPV positive — 44 women with recent HPV triage, 11 women in follow-up for HPV triage. CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. HPV = human papillomavirus.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Paired speculum and non-speculum sample results among women with CIN2+ on biopsy or excision

    Speculum sampleNon-speculum sample
    HPV positive, n (%)HPV negative, n (%)Total, n (%)
    HPV positive11 (91.7)0 (0.0)11 (91.7)
    HPV negative0 (0.0)1 (8.3)1 (8.3)
    Total11 (91.7)1 (8.3)12 (100.0)
    • CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. HPV = human papillomavirus.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Paired speculum and non-speculum sample results among women with negative cytology, who had speculum and non-speculum samples collected on the same day

    Speculum sampleNon-speculum sample
    HPV positive, n (%)HPV negative, n (%)Total, n (%)
    HPV positive10 (4.9)0 (0.0)10 (4.9)
    HPV negative7 (3.4)187 (91.7)194 (95.1)
    Total17 (8.3)187 (91.7)204 (100.0)
    • HPV = human papillomavirus.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Paired speculum and non-speculum sample results among women with <CIN2 on biopsy or excision, or who attended colposcopy and no biopsy was taken

    Speculum sampleNon-speculum sample
    HPV positive, n (%)HPV negative, n (%)Total, n (%)
    HPV positive41 (82.0)4 (8.0)45 (90.0)
    HPV negative0 (0.0)5 (10.0)5 (10.0)
    Total41 (82.0)9 (18.0)50 (100)
    • CIN = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. HPV = human papillomavirus.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Questionnaire responses from routine-screening participants (n = 182) who had both speculum and non-speculum samples collected

    ExperienceNon-speculum sample, n (%)aConventional sample, n (%)aPearson’s χ2 test, P-value
    Overall experience of test
      Excellent/good164 (90.1)132 (73.3)<0.001
      Fair/poor18 (9.9)48 (26.7)
      Missing02
    Discomfort
      None115 (63.5)42 (23.1)<0.001
      Mild/quite a lot/severe66 (36.5)140 (76.9)
      Missing10
    Embarrassment
      Not at all128 (70.7)121 (66.5)0.45
      Mildly/fairly/very53 (29.3)61 (33.5)
      Missing10
    Preferences
    Test preference
      Non-speculum133 (77.8)
      Conventional speculum14 (8.2)
      No preference24 (14.0)
      Missing11
    Future preference
      Non-speculum120 (70.6)
      Conventional speculum17 (10.0)
      No preference33 (19.4)
      Missing12
    • ↵a Reported as the percentage of responders to that question.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

  • BJGP.2021.0708_suppl.pdf

PODCAST

  • BJGP.2021.0708_podcast.mp3

VIDEO

  • BJGP.2021.0708_Video.mp4
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (721)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 721
August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women
Rebecca Landy, Tony Hollingworth, Jo Waller, Laura AV Marlow, Jane Rigney, Thomas Round, Peter D Sasieni, Anita WW Lim
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): e538-e545. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0708

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for human papillomavirus testing: a cross-sectional study in older women
Rebecca Landy, Tony Hollingworth, Jo Waller, Laura AV Marlow, Jane Rigney, Thomas Round, Peter D Sasieni, Anita WW Lim
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (721): e538-e545. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0708
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alphapapillomavirus
  • cervical cancer screening
  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • general practice
  • self-sampling

More in this TOC Section

  • Antibiotics versus no treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in residents of aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study
  • Primary care practice and cancer suspicion during the first three COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: a qualitative study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242