Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Implications of the changes to patient online records access in English primary care

Brian McMillan, Gail Davidge, Charlotte Blease and Jessica Watson
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (725): 558-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp22X721205
Brian McMillan
Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roles: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brian McMillan
Gail Davidge
Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roles: Research Associate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gail Davidge
Charlotte Blease
Digital Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, US.
Roles: Research Affiliate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Watson
Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Roles: NIHR Clinical Lecturer in General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jessica Watson
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

BACKGROUND

This year, NHS England (NHSE) announced that from November, most patients in England registered for online services such as the NHS App will be able to see all new entries in their primary care record by default.1 This includes free text, hospital letters, test results, and new data added to the detailed coded record (DCR). Historic information in the record has not become visible as a result of the November change, but there are plans to enable requests to access the historic DCR via the NHS App in 2023.1

Since April 2019, the GP contract committed GPs in England to offer patients prospective online records access (ORA).2 Prior to November, GP surgeries could grant access to patients on a case-by-case basis, determine the level of access (such as Summary Care Record only, DCR only, or full record), and set the date from which data was visible. This resulted in inconsistent levels of access, something that patients reported as frustrating.3 NHS Digital’s data highlight these inconsistencies; in August 2022, although 48.1% of adult patients in England could order repeat prescriptions online, only 13.9% were able to view their DCR.4 Despite documented benefits of ORA,3,5,6 primary care staff have raised concerns7–9 that can be grouped into issues around workload, safeguarding, patient confusion or distress, and health inequities.

WORKLOAD

One recent small qualitative study found that ORA could or did increase workload by requiring preparation of records prior to granting access, managing …

View Full Text

  RCGP login

Members, please Login at RCGP to access the journal online

  Subscriber login

Enter your BJGP login information below.

Log in using your username and password

Enter your British Journal of General Practice username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

  Subscribe

Subscribe to the Journal - Subscribe to the print and/or online journal.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 72 (725)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 72, Issue 725
December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implications of the changes to patient online records access in English primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Implications of the changes to patient online records access in English primary care
Brian McMillan, Gail Davidge, Charlotte Blease, Jessica Watson
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (725): 558-559. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X721205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Implications of the changes to patient online records access in English primary care
Brian McMillan, Gail Davidge, Charlotte Blease, Jessica Watson
British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72 (725): 558-559. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X721205
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • BACKGROUND
    • WORKLOAD
    • SAFEGUARDING
    • PATIENT CONFUSION OR DISTRESS
    • HEALTH INEQUITIES
    • THE FUTURE
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Socioeconomic deprivation and post-stroke care in the community
  • Advocating for patients through laboratory tests: what do GPs’ use of blood tests for suspected cancer tell us?
  • Diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: navigating updated clinical guidance
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242