Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Life & Times

Turning diversity from a barrier to a facilitator of empathy in health care

Jeremy Howick, Dinesh Palipana, Hajira Dambha-Miller and Kamlesh Khunti
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (726): 24-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp23X731613
Jeremy Howick
Jeremy is the Director of the Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare at the University of Leicester and author of a bestselling book: Email: @jeremyhowick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jh815@leicester.ac.uk
Dinesh Palipana
Dinesh Palipana is an emergency doctor, a lawyer, and was Australia’s Person of the Year in 2021.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hajira Dambha-Miller
Hajira Dambha-Miller is an NIHR Clinical Lecturer at the University of Southampton and a GP. @HDambhaMiller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamlesh Khunti
Kamlesh Khunti, CBE, is Professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine at the University of Leicester. @kamleshkhunti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Diversity is on the rise globally. To mention just a few of diversity’s dimensions in the UK, 10 million (14.5%) of the country’s citizens were born outside the UK, 9 million (14%) of the population is non-White, and there are six main religions with at least 250 000 adherents.1 A similar picture presents itself in many other parts of the world. In the US, 45 million (14%) of the population were born outside the country, 204 million (almost 40%) belong to ethnic minority communities, and there are 11 religions with at least 1 million adherents.2

Within the same hour in a clinic, a healthcare practitioner may see a male farmer nearing retirement with back pain who has never spoken about his feelings, a female immigrant from Syria with respiratory problems who is worried about paying for her care, a young student using a wheelchair experiencing depression, and a transgender patient attending a routine check-up.

This diversity is a cause for celebration. It can also present a barrier to empathy, which is frequently defined as understanding, expressing the understanding, and therapeutic action.3 Attempts to understand and appropriate ways to express understanding vary from person to person and culture to culture. A reassuring touch may be the expected norm in some cultures, but a violation of morals in others. Asking a patient how they feel about a proposed treatment may delight a well-informed patient, yet signal incompetence to a patient who may expect and accept that their doctor knows best. Spontaneously opening the door for an older woman may be appreciated, yet the same act could offend someone in a wheelchair who prefers to do it themselves.

A BARRIER TO EMPATHIC CARE IS A BARRIER TO GOOD CARE

Barriers to empathic care are barriers to effective care. Empathic care is a cornerstone of person-centred care,4 and a growing body of increasingly robust evidence is showing that lack of empathy causes harm,5 while empathic care improves patient outcomes. A cohort study of 867 people with type 2 diabetes found an association between empathic care and reduced mortality.6 Meanwhile, several randomised trials also suggest that empathic care reduces patient pain while improving their satisfaction with care.7 A parallel series of randomised trials also shows that therapeutic empathy can be taught.8 A happy side effect of empathy’s benefit to patients is that it also appears to decrease the risk of burnout among healthcare professionals.9 A caveat to the evidence on empathy’s effectiveness in health care is that most of the large studies have involved predominantly White patients. The extent to which empathic care benefits patients from ethnic minorities and other diverse groups is therefore an area where future research is required.

RELATIVE LACK OF HEALTHCARE PRACTITIONER DIVERSITY

The relative lack of diversity among healthcare practitioners could exacerbate the challenge to empathy posed by increasingly diverse patients. In the US10 and the UK,11 most healthcare practitioners identify as ‘White’. Healthcare practitioners are also better educated than the average person, but this is a double-edged sword. While we need well-educated doctors, they are more comfortable with medical jargon than most patients, and using medical jargon has been shown to inhibit good communication and even harm patients.12

This problem is aggravated further if the patient’s first language is not English. While the effect of the relative homogeneity of practitioners is under-researched, we know that diversity of practitioners matters. Female practitioners are rated by patients as being more empathic than males,13 and practitioner ethnicity seems to influence empathy levels.14

Differences between practitioners and patients can affect empathic care. A secondary analysis of data from over 25 000 practitioners found that their implicit attitudes towards patients who are disabled can be negative.15 Furthermore, a systematic review of 18 studies with almost 10 000 patients found that patients with lower socioeconomic status experienced lower levels of empathy from their clinicians, and White patients experienced higher levels of empathy than their ethnic minority counterparts.16 A medical trainee in one qualitative study stated: ‘It is challenging to empathise with those patients who do not understand your language. You can extract some factual information; however, you cannot build up an empathetic relationship with the patient.’17 Left unaddressed, the problems arising from differences between practitioners will get worse, since diversity among practitioners is increasing at a slower rate than the diversity of patients, particularly in relation to certain forms of diversity such as disability.18

EMBRACING DIVERSITY AS A SOLUTION

While patient diversity is a potential impediment to empathy, it also points towards a solution.19 Exposing patients to healthcare professionals from a diverse range of ethnic and social backgrounds, and vice versa, creates fertile ground for fostering unconscious (and, perhaps, conscious) normalisation and acceptance of different opinions, cultures, and beliefs. Diverse environments also provide opportunities for patients and practitioners to learn the necessary skills to be able to adapt communication, clinical, and empathic practices to the person they are working with, whatever that individual’s background. By contrast, when practitioners work within a homogeneous group to which they already belong, they may rely on (perhaps often correct) assumptions about patients, thus allowing their ‘empathy muscle’ to atrophy. Embracing diversity can therefore transform it from a barrier to a facilitator of empathic care.

SUGGESTIONS FOR USING DIVERSITY AS A TOOL TO ENHANCE EMPATHY

There are several concrete things that can be done to turn diversity from a barrier to a facilitator of empathy.

  • Communicate in plain English. Communicating in ways that the lay public can understand is a simple yet powerful tool that can lay the groundwork for empathic care and will reduce obstacles to such care in many different groups, especially for patients whose first language is not English.

  • Embrace diversity as an opportunity to stimulate the ‘empathy muscle’. When faced with patients we perceive as ‘different’, we should adopt an attitude of ‘empathic curiosity’. Jodi Halpern,20 who coined the term ‘empathic curiosity’, encourages us to begin by recognising that we do not always understand what people are thinking or feeling, then allowing our emotional responses to guide our imagination (supplemented, of course, by communication with the patient!).

  • Introduce empathy and diversity training. The value of diversity as an empathy-enhancing tool can be integrated into practitioner education via the art and science of therapeutic empathy. Similarly, cultural competency can be developed by discussing and reflecting on the impact of cultural diversity on health throughout professional training.

  • Encourage students from all walks of life and cultures to attend medical school.

CONCLUSION

Most developed countries have increasingly diverse populations. This context presents a challenge to empathic health care, as well as an opportunity.

Better communication, using diversity as an opportunity to train the ‘empathy muscle’, and formal training in empathy and diversity can help transform diversity from a potential barrier to a catalyst for empathic care. Such a change is essential for medicine to achieve its aim of improving patients’ lives in an increasingly diverse world.

Footnotes

  • This article (with reference list), was first posted on BJGP Life on 16 November 2022; https://bjgplife.com/divers

  • © British Journal of General Practice 2023

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Office of National Statistics
    Census 2021 data. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
  2. 2.↵
    1. United States Census Bureau
    (2022) 2020 census. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-census-main.html (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mercer SW,
    2. Maxwell M,
    3. Heaney D,
    4. Watt GC
    (2004) The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract 21, 6, 699–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hardman D,
    2. Howick J
    (2019) The friendly relationship between therapeutic empathy and person-centered care. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc 7, 2, 351–357.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Butler CC,
    2. Pill R,
    3. Stott NC
    (1998) Qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of doctors’ advice to quit smoking: implications for opportunistic health promotion. BMJ 316, 7148, 1878–1881.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dambha-Miller H,
    2. Feldman AL,
    3. Kinmoth AL,
    4. Griffin SJ
    (2019) Association between primary care practitioner empathy and risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based prospective cohort study. Ann Fam Med 17, 4, 311–318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Howick J,
    2. Moscrop A,
    3. Mebius A,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med 111, 7, 240–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Winter R,
    2. Issa E,
    3. Roberts N,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 10, 9, e036471.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yue Z,
    2. Qin Y,
    3. Li Y,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Empathy and burnout in medical staff: mediating role of job satisfaction and job commitment. BMC Public Health 22, 1, 1033.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges
    (2022) Diversity in medicine: facts and figures 2019. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/figure-18-percentage-all-active-physicians-race/ethnicity-2018 (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
  11. 11.↵
    1. NHS Digital
    (2020) NHS workforce. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/workforce-and-business/workforce-diversity/nhs-workforce/latest (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Okada A,
    2. Tsuchihashi-Makaya M,
    3. Nagao N,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Somatic changes perceived by patients with heart failure during acute exacerbation: a qualitative study using text mining. J Cardiovasc Nurs doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000915.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Howick J,
    2. Steinkopf L,
    3. Ulyte A,
    4. et al.
    (2017) How empathic is your healthcare practitioner? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient surveys. BMC Med Educ 17, 1, 136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Liew S-C,
    2. Azim DHF
    (2022) In someone else’s shoes, are all wearers the same? Empathy in multi-ethnic Asian medical students. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 17, 3, 498–505.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. VanPuymbrouck L,
    2. Friedman C,
    3. Feldner H
    (2020) Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of healthcare providers. Rehabil Psychol 65, 2, 101–112.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Roberts BW,
    2. Puri NK,
    3. Trzeciak CJ,
    4. et al.
    (2021) Socioeconomic, racial and ethnic differences in patient experience of clinician empathy: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247259.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chhabra N,
    2. Chhabra S,
    3. Archer E
    (2022) Medical students’ perspectives on the factors affecting empathy development during their undergraduate training. Med Sci Educ 32, 1, 79–89.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Meeks LM,
    2. Herzer K,
    3. Jain NR
    (2018) Removing barriers and facilitating access: increasing the number of physicians with disabilities. Acad Med 93, 4, 540–543.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Warren LH
    (2005) Using multicultural literature to develop empathy and compassion in preservice teachers: a first step in preparing culturally responsive teachers (Georgia Southern University), https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1489&context=etd (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
  20. 20.↵
    1. Halpern J,
    2. Fraga J
    (Mar 22, 2022) Empathic curiosity is a way for health care professionals to manage stress. The Spokesman-Review, https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/mar/22/empathic-curiosity-is-a-way-for-health-care-profes/ (accessed 29 Nov 2022).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 73 (726)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 73, Issue 726
January 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Turning diversity from a barrier to a facilitator of empathy in health care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Turning diversity from a barrier to a facilitator of empathy in health care
Jeremy Howick, Dinesh Palipana, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Kamlesh Khunti
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (726): 24-25. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp23X731613

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Turning diversity from a barrier to a facilitator of empathy in health care
Jeremy Howick, Dinesh Palipana, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Kamlesh Khunti
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (726): 24-25. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp23X731613
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • A BARRIER TO EMPATHIC CARE IS A BARRIER TO GOOD CARE
    • RELATIVE LACK OF HEALTHCARE PRACTITIONER DIVERSITY
    • EMBRACING DIVERSITY AS A SOLUTION
    • SUGGESTIONS FOR USING DIVERSITY AS A TOOL TO ENHANCE EMPATHY
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Books: 36 Hours
  • A world without general practice
  • SNOMED CT: working smarter, not harder
Show more Life & Times

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242