Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care

Benthe H König, Cornelia HM van Jaarsveld, Erik WMA Bischoff, Henk J Schers, Peter LBJ Lucassen and Tim C Olde Hartman
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (730): e340-e347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0158
Benthe H König
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: Biomedical scientist in training
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelia HM van Jaarsveld
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: Epidemiologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cornelia HM van Jaarsveld
Erik WMA Bischoff
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: GP and senior researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik WMA Bischoff
Henk J Schers
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: GP and professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Henk J Schers
Peter LBJ Lucassen
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: GP and senior researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter LBJ Lucassen
Tim C Olde Hartman
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roles: GP and senior researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tim C Olde Hartman
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

eLetter submission guidelines

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com. PLEASE NOTE: your email address will be published.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    Cornelia H. van Jaarsveld
    Published on: 22 May 2023
  • Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    Ryuichi Ohta
    Published on: 07 May 2023
  • Published on: (22 May 2023)
    Page navigation anchor for Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    • Cornelia H. van Jaarsveld, Epidemiologist, Radboud university medical center, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    We would like to take this opportunity to respond to three statements in the eLetter by Ryuichi Ohta1 related to our paper.2

    1. “…This research clarified that patients not diagnosed but suspected of COVID-19 tend to have persistent fatigue….”
    We now realise that referring to ‘suspected COVID-19’ in our paper might be incorrectly chosen. We selected the term ‘suspected COVID-19’ to be transparent that at the very beginning of the pandemic there was no test capacity in the Netherlands and therefore all patients were included in the study based on a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.3 In primary care, a clinical diagnosis based on specific symptoms is standard practice for many diseases. All participating GPs are part of a large registration network (FaMe-net) and are therefore experienced in registering morbidity reliably. Although misclassification cannot be completely ruled out, we want to emphasize that all included patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 by GPs using standard best practice clinical criteria.

    2. “…Considering this study's results, family physicians should diagnose COVID-19 precisely among physically and mentally vulnerable patients not to induce fatigue among them….”
    We believe GPs should always diagnose COVID-19 precisely, not only in vulnerable patients. As highlighted above, all patients included in the study were diag...

    Show More

    We would like to take this opportunity to respond to three statements in the eLetter by Ryuichi Ohta1 related to our paper.2

    1. “…This research clarified that patients not diagnosed but suspected of COVID-19 tend to have persistent fatigue….”
    We now realise that referring to ‘suspected COVID-19’ in our paper might be incorrectly chosen. We selected the term ‘suspected COVID-19’ to be transparent that at the very beginning of the pandemic there was no test capacity in the Netherlands and therefore all patients were included in the study based on a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.3 In primary care, a clinical diagnosis based on specific symptoms is standard practice for many diseases. All participating GPs are part of a large registration network (FaMe-net) and are therefore experienced in registering morbidity reliably. Although misclassification cannot be completely ruled out, we want to emphasize that all included patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 by GPs using standard best practice clinical criteria.

    2. “…Considering this study's results, family physicians should diagnose COVID-19 precisely among physically and mentally vulnerable patients not to induce fatigue among them….”
    We believe GPs should always diagnose COVID-19 precisely, not only in vulnerable patients. As highlighted above, all patients included in the study were diagnosed by GPs based on specific clinical symptoms according to current best practice.

    3. “…To prevent needless fatigue from suspecting COVID-19 infection, family physicians should be trained, and suspect COVID-19 precisely and cautiously based on the evidence….”
    Dr Ohta suggests that our study might have induced fatigue. We are not entirely sure whether Dr Ohta proposes that this may occur due to either misdiagnosing COVID-19 or by exposing vulnerable patients to questionnaires. We consider misdiagnosing as improbable because the GPs diagnosed COVID-19 according to standard practice. In addition, we do not believe that asking patients to fill in a questionnaire about chronic fatigue is causing complaints of long-COVID. Although questionnaires do sometimes cause distress, this is always of short duration.4,5

    By Dr Cornelia van Jaarsveld on behalf of  B König, E Bischoff, H Schers, P Lucassen & T Olde Hartman.

    References
    1. Ohta R. Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care. eLetter Br J Gen Pract; Published on: 07 May 2023.
    2. Konig BH, van Jaarsveld CH, Bischoff EW, Schers HJ, Lucassen PL, Olde Hartman TC. Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2023;73:e340-e7.
    3. Schers H, van Weel C, van Boven K, et al. The COVID-19 Pandemic in Nijmegen, the Netherlands: changes in presented health problems and demand for primary care. Ann Fam Med 2021;19(1):44–7.
    4. Takesaka J, Crowley R, Casarett D. What is the risk of distress in palliative care survey research? J Pain Symptom Manage 2004 Dec;28(6):593-8.
    5. Ben-Nun P. (Ed.) Respondent Fatigue in: Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. (2008) (Vols. 1-0). Sage Publications, Inc.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (7 May 2023)
    Page navigation anchor for Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    Necessity of accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care
    • Ryuichi Ohta, Family physician, Unnan City Hospital, Japan

    I have read, with great surprise, the research titled “Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care.”1 This research clarified that patients not diagnosed but suspected of COVID-19 tend to have persistent fatigue, one of the typical symptoms of long COVID in clinical courses, four times more frequently than those not suspected of COVID-19. The clarified associated factors to fatigue were frequent GP contact, polypharmacy, and frequent life events, showing that physically and mentally vulnerable patients tend to have fatigue when suspected of COVID-19.

    Considering this study's results, family physicians should diagnose COVID-19 precisely among physically and mentally vulnerable patients not to induce fatigue among them. Long COVID is not understood clearly based on the pathophysiology and prognosis.2 Mentally vulnerable patients tend to be affected more by medically vague conditions such as Long COVID, causing further mental stress.3 Although the fear of COVID-19 is dispelled, vulnerable patients are informed about possible critical conditions when infected. So, when diagnosed with COVID-19, they may have colossal stress, causing mental imbalance and manifesting the symptoms of fatigue.3 COVID-19 is not a superficial viral infection and has social aspects affecting patients’ mentality. To prevent needless fatigue from suspecting COV...

    Show More

    I have read, with great surprise, the research titled “Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care.”1 This research clarified that patients not diagnosed but suspected of COVID-19 tend to have persistent fatigue, one of the typical symptoms of long COVID in clinical courses, four times more frequently than those not suspected of COVID-19. The clarified associated factors to fatigue were frequent GP contact, polypharmacy, and frequent life events, showing that physically and mentally vulnerable patients tend to have fatigue when suspected of COVID-19.

    Considering this study's results, family physicians should diagnose COVID-19 precisely among physically and mentally vulnerable patients not to induce fatigue among them. Long COVID is not understood clearly based on the pathophysiology and prognosis.2 Mentally vulnerable patients tend to be affected more by medically vague conditions such as Long COVID, causing further mental stress.3 Although the fear of COVID-19 is dispelled, vulnerable patients are informed about possible critical conditions when infected. So, when diagnosed with COVID-19, they may have colossal stress, causing mental imbalance and manifesting the symptoms of fatigue.3 COVID-19 is not a superficial viral infection and has social aspects affecting patients’ mentality. To prevent needless fatigue from suspecting COVID-19 infection, family physicians should be trained, and suspect COVID-19 precisely and cautiously based on the evidence.

    References
    1. Konig BH, van Jaarsveld CH, Bischoff EW, Schers HJ, Lucassen PL, Olde Hartman TC. Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2023;73: e340-e7.
    2. Mizrahi B, Sudry T, Flaks-Manov N, et al. Long covid outcomes at one year after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2023;380: e072529.
    3. Sun Y, Wu Y, Fan S, et al. Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts. BMJ 2023;380: e074224.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 73 (730)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 73, Issue 730
May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care
Benthe H König, Cornelia HM van Jaarsveld, Erik WMA Bischoff, Henk J Schers, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Tim C Olde Hartman
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (730): e340-e347. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0158

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic factors for persistent fatigue after COVID-19: a prospective matched cohort study in primary care
Benthe H König, Cornelia HM van Jaarsveld, Erik WMA Bischoff, Henk J Schers, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Tim C Olde Hartman
British Journal of General Practice 2023; 73 (730): e340-e347. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0158
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • determinants
  • long COVID
  • outpatients
  • persistent fatigue
  • primary healthcare
  • prospective cohort study

More in this TOC Section

  • Trends in the registration of anxiety in Belgian primary care from 2000 to 2021: a registry-based study
  • Characteristics of good home-based end-of-life care: analysis of 5-year data from a nationwide mortality follow-back survey in England
  • Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242