Advertisement

More articles from Essay

‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice: a defining paper, its impact, and psychodynamic potential
Andrew Moscrop

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 346-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572490
Second thoughts about the NHS reforms
Mike Fitzpatrick

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572508
Good enough care?
Helen Lester

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572526
Social prescribing in very deprived areas
Peter Cawston

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572517
What is the collective noun for a group of patients?
David Carvel

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X567333
Development of undergraduate family medicine teaching in China
Yafang Huang and Aimin Guo

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 304-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X568134
The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
John GS Goldie

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 306-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X568143
How big is your society?
James Willis

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X568152
Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Max Pittler, Christopher Mavergames, Edzard Ernst and Gerd Antes

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 302-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X567342
The Fraserburgh Situation
David Stevenson

British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (584): 236-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X561483

Pages