Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Identifying patients at risk of psychosis: a qualitative study of GP views in South West England

Daniela Strelchuk, Nicola Wiles, Catherine Derrick, Stanley Zammit and Katrina Turner
British Journal of General Practice 30 November 2020; bjgp20X713969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X713969
Daniela Strelchuk
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol, Weston NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Bristol.
Roles: PhD student
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Wiles
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol, Weston NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Bristol.
Roles: Professor of epidemiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Derrick
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol.
Roles: Field worker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley Zammit
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol; MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Roles: Professor of psychiatric epidemiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina Turner
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol, Weston NHS Foundation Trust, and University of Bristol.
Roles: Professor in primary care research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Early intervention in people with an at-risk mental state for psychosis can decrease the rates of transition to psychosis. GPs play a key role in the identification of this patient group but very few studies have explored GPs’ awareness of patients who are at risk of psychosis.

Aim To explore GPs’ views and experiences of identifying patients with an at-risk mental state for psychosis, and the barriers and facilitators to identification.

Design and setting In-depth semi-structured interviews were held with GPs working in South West England primary care. The interviews were conducted between March and July 2019.

Method A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. This guide was revised to incorporate a definition of the at-risk mental state for psychosis, as after conducting a few interviews it became clear that some GPs were not familiar with this construct. Interviews were audiorecorded and analysed thematically.

Results A total of 20 GPs were interviewed. Some GPs were not familiar with the concept of being at risk of developing psychosis, and perceived that they may not have the right skills to identify this patient group. Other barriers related to patients not presenting or disclosing psychotic symptoms, and limitations imposed by scarce resources on the structure and provision of NHS services, such as lack of continuity of care and high thresholds for accessing specialised services.

Conclusion Identifying people at risk of psychosis in primary care is difficult. Provision of GP training, development of policies that support continuity of care, and improved access to specialised services could help improve the identification of this patient group.

  • at-risk mental state
  • general practice
  • identification, barriers
  • psychosis
  • semi-structured interviews
  • Received April 6, 2020.
  • Revision requested May 1, 2020.
  • Accepted July 13, 2020.
  • © British Journal of General Practice 2020
View Full Text

  RCGP login

Members, please Login at RCGP to access the journal online.

  Subscriber login

Enter your BJGP login information below.

Log in using your username and password

Enter your British Journal of General Practice username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

  Subscribe

Subscribe to the Journal - Subscribe to the print and/or online journal.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identifying patients at risk of psychosis: a qualitative study of GP views in South West England
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identifying patients at risk of psychosis: a qualitative study of GP views in South West England
Daniela Strelchuk, Nicola Wiles, Catherine Derrick, Stanley Zammit, Katrina Turner
British Journal of General Practice 30 November 2020; bjgp20X713969. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713969

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Identifying patients at risk of psychosis: a qualitative study of GP views in South West England
Daniela Strelchuk, Nicola Wiles, Catherine Derrick, Stanley Zammit, Katrina Turner
British Journal of General Practice 30 November 2020; bjgp20X713969. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713969
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • at-risk mental state
  • general practice
  • identification, barriers
  • psychosis
  • semi-structured interviews

More in this TOC Section

  • Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial
  • Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care
  • Orthopaedic corticosteroid injections and risk of acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242