Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension related workload

Sarah Lay-Flurrie, James Sheppard, Richard J Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, FD Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant and Richard McManus
British Journal of General Practice 17 December 2020; bjgp21X714281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714281
Sarah Lay-Flurrie
1 University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: richard.mcmanus@phc.ox.ac.uk
James Sheppard
2 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J Stevens
3 University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Mallen
4 Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Heneghan
5 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FD Richard Hobbs
6 University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan Williams
7 University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Mant
8 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard McManus
8 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: In 2011, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommended the routine use of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring for the diagnosis of hypertension. These changes were predicted to reduce unnecessary treatment costs and workload associated with misdiagnosis. Aim: To assess the impact of guideline change on rates of hypertension-related consultation in general practice. Design and Setting: Cohort study in adults registered with English general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1/4/2006 and 31/3/2017. Method: The primary outcome was the rate of face-to-face, telephone and visit consultations related to hypertension with a GP or nurse. Age and sex standardized rates were analysed using interrupted time-series analysis. Results: In 3,937,191 adults (median follow-up = 4.2 years) there were 12,253,836 hypertension related consultations. The rate of hypertension related consultation was 71.0 per 100 person-years (95% CI 67.8 to 74.2) in April 2006, which remained flat prior to 2011. The introduction of the NICE hypertension guideline in 2011 was associated with a change in yearly trend (change in trend = -3.60 per 100 person-years, 95% CI -5.12 to -2.09). The rate of consultation subsequently decreased to 59.2 per 100 person-years (95% CI 56.5 to 61.8) in March 2017. These changes occurred around the time of diagnosis and persisted when accounting for wider trends in all consultations. Conclusion: Hypertension-related workload has declined in the last decade, in association with guideline changes. This is due to changes in workload at the time of diagnosis, rather than reductions in misdiagnosis.

  • Clinical (physical)
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Hypertension
  • Received June 1, 2020.
  • Accepted October 2, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension related workload
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension related workload
Sarah Lay-Flurrie, James Sheppard, Richard J Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, FD Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant, Richard McManus
British Journal of General Practice 17 December 2020; bjgp21X714281. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension related workload
Sarah Lay-Flurrie, James Sheppard, Richard J Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, FD Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant, Richard McManus
British Journal of General Practice 17 December 2020; bjgp21X714281. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714281
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Clinical (physical)
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Hypertension

More in this TOC Section

  • Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial
  • Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care
  • Orthopaedic corticosteroid injections and risk of acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242