Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

GPs’ use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk in primary care: A qualitative study

Claire Friedemann Smith, Benedikte Moller Kristensen, Rikke Sand Andersen, FD Richard Hobbs, Sue Ziebland and Brian D Nicholson
British Journal of General Practice 22 December 2020; bjgp21X714269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714269
Claire Friedemann Smith
1 Primary Care Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: claire.friedemann@phc.ox.ac.uk
Benedikte Moller Kristensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rikke Sand Andersen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FD Richard Hobbs
7 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue Ziebland
8 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian D Nicholson
9 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

bjgp21X714269
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714269

Published By 
Royal College of General Practitioners
Print ISSN 
0960-1643
Online ISSN 
1478-5242
History 
  • Received July 28, 2020
  • Accepted October 1, 2020
  • Published online December 22, 2020.

Article Versions

  • Previous version (December 17, 2020 - 16:30).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2020, The Authors This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Author Information

  1. Claire Friedemann Smith1,*,
  2. Benedikte Moller Kristensen2,3,4,
  3. Rikke Sand Andersen5,6,
  4. FD Richard Hobbs7,
  5. Sue Ziebland8 and
  6. Brian D Nicholson9
  1. 1 Primary Care Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. 2 Region Sjaelland, Soro, Denmark
  3. 3 Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  4. 4 University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
  5. 5 Institute for Public Health - General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  6. 6 Department of Anthropology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  7. 7 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  8. 8 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  9. 9 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  1. ↵ *For correspondence:
    Claire Friedemann Smith, claire.friedemann{at}phc.ox.ac.uk

Article usage

Article usage: December 2020 to February 2021

AbstractFullPdf
Dec 2020370051
Jan 2021504093
Feb 2021320036

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GPs’ use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk in primary care: A qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
GPs’ use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk in primary care: A qualitative study
Claire Friedemann Smith, Benedikte Moller Kristensen, Rikke Sand Andersen, FD Richard Hobbs, Sue Ziebland, Brian D Nicholson
British Journal of General Practice 22 December 2020; bjgp21X714269. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714269

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
GPs’ use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk in primary care: A qualitative study
Claire Friedemann Smith, Benedikte Moller Kristensen, Rikke Sand Andersen, FD Richard Hobbs, Sue Ziebland, Brian D Nicholson
British Journal of General Practice 22 December 2020; bjgp21X714269. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X714269
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Clinical (general)
  • Diagnosis
  • International
  • Clinical (physical)
  • Cancer
  • Education and standards
  • Patient safety
  • Research methods
  • Epidemiology

More in this TOC Section

  • Is there an association between long-term antibiotics for acne and subsequent infection sequelae and antimicrobial resistance? A systematic review
  • Factors associated with potentially missed acute deterioration in primary care
  • Inequalities in health-related quality of life: repeated cross-sectional study of trends in general practice survey data
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242