Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care

Kirsten D Arendse, Fiona M Walter, Mark Pilling, Yin Zhou, Willie Hamilton and Garth Funston
British Journal of General Practice 11 January 2021; bjgp20X714077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714077
Kirsten D Arendse
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Research associate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fiona M Walter
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Reader in primary care cancer research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Pilling
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Senior research associate in statistics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yin Zhou
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Wellcome Trust primary care doctoral fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willie Hamilton
University of Exeter, Exeter.
Roles: Professor of primary care diagnostics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Willie Hamilton
Garth Funston
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Roles: Clinical research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Evaluated time intervals from presentation to diagnosis.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Application of study inclusion criteria. CPRD = Clinical Practice Research Datalink. HES DID = Hospital Episode Statistics Diagnostic Imaging Dataset. NCRAS = National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

Tables

  • Figures
  • How this fits in

    England’s national cancer referral guidelines recommend that patients attending general practice with unexplained symptoms possibly caused by lung cancer, such as persistent cough, shortness of breath, and weight loss, have a chest X-ray promptly (within 14 days) to aid timely diagnosis. Only 35% of patients with lung cancer in this study had a chest X-ray within the recommended 14 days; and time between attending general practice with symptoms and having an X-ray was longer among people who smoke, females, and older patients. This research highlights a potential source of delayed lung cancer diagnosis and could inform initiatives aiming to achieve earlier diagnosis and improve outcomes.
    • View popup
    Box 1.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for referral of suspected cancer (2005)8

    Section 1.3: Lung cancer
    Specific recommendations
    1.3.2. An urgent referral for a chest X-ray should be made when a patient presents with:
    • haemoptysis, or

    • any of the following unexplained persistent, that is, lasting >3 weeks, symptoms and signs: chest and/or shoulder pain, dyspnoea, weight loss, chest signs, hoarseness, finger clubbing, cervical and/ or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy, cough with or without any of the above, features suggestive of metastasis from a lung cancer, for example, in brain, bone, liver, or skin.


    1.3.3. An urgent referral should be made for either of the following:
    • persistent haemoptysis in smokers or ex-smokers who are aged ≥40 years; or

    • a chest X-ray suggestive of lung cancer (including pleural effusion and slowly resolving consolidation).

    1.3.4. Immediate referral should be considered for the following:
    • signs of superior vena caval obstruction (swelling of the face and/or neck with fixed elevation of jugular venous pressure); or

    • stridor.

    Referral timelines
    The referral timelines used in this guideline are as follows:
    • Immediate: an acute admission or referral occurring within a few hours, or even more quickly if necessary.

    • Urgent: the patient is seen within the national target for urgent referrals (currently 2 weeks).

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Proportion of NICE-guideline concordant pre-diagnostic chest X-rays (≤ 14 days after presentation) among symptomatic patients with lung cancer by sociodemographic factors

    Patients in cohort, n (%)Total, N
    Chest X-ray ≤ 14 days (guideline concordant)Chest X-ray >14 days (guideline non-concordant)
    All727 (35)1375 (65)2102
    Sex
      Male426 (37)722 (63)1148
      Female301 (32)653 (68)954
    Age categories, years
      <401 (33)2 (67)3
      40–4925 (48)27 (52)52
      50–5985 (35)156 (65)241
      60–69214 (37)362 (63)576
      70–79240 (32)517 (68)757
      80–89142 (34)279 (66)421
      ≥9020 (38)32 (62)52
    Deprivation quintile
      1 (least deprived)133 (36)234 (64)367
      2147 (40)223 (60)370
      3141 (33)280 (67)421
      4152 (35)286 (65)438
      5 (most deprived)154 (30)352 (70)506
    Smoking status
      Non-smoker71 (48)78 (52)149
      Ex-smoker396 (34)772 (66)1168
      Smoker260 (33)525 (67)785
    Number of features on first presentation
      1692 (35)1285 (65)1977
      >135 (28)90 (72)125
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Association between demographics and presentation–test intervals using negative binomial regressiona

    Patients in cohortPresentation–test interval, days
    n (%)Median (IQR)IRR (adjusted)b95% CI (P-value)
    Total2102 (100)49 (5–172)––
    Constant––35.7723.09 to 55.40 (<0.001)
    Sex
      Male1148 (55)41 (4–162)Ref–
      Female954 (45)63 (7–182)1.121.02 to 1.24 (0.016)
    Age
      For every additional––1.071.01 to 1.12 (0.013)
      10 years from age 27
    Deprivation quintile
      1 (least deprived)367 (17)43 (4–162)Ref–
      2370 (18)37 (3–147)0.860.73 to 1.02 (0.081)
      3421 (20)46 (6–173)1.010.86 to 1.18 (0.927)
      4438 (21)49 (6–184)1.030.88 to 1.21 (0.704)
      5 (most deprived)506 (24)73 (9–184)1.080.93 to 1.25 (0.326)
    Smoking status
      Non-smoker149 (7)18 (1–85)RefRef
      Ex-smoker1168 (56)52 (6–173)1.581.26 to 1.99 (<0.001)
      Smoker785 (37)55 (6–181)1.631.29 to 2.05 (<0.001)
    Number of features on first presentation
      11977 (94)48 (5–170)RefRef
      >1125 (6)91 (10–190)1.201.00 to 1.43 (0.052)
    ln (alpha)––0.820.77 to 0.88
    • ↵a Likelihood ratio (LR) test of alpha = 0, χ2 = 240 000, P < 0.001.

    • ↵b Variables included in the adjusted analysis include sex, age in years, level of deprivation, smoking status, and number of features at first presentation. IQR = interquartile range. IRR = incidence rate ratio. ln (alpha) = natural log of alpha. Alpha is the over-dispersion parameter (values >0 indicate the distribution’s variance is greater than its mean).

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

  • bjgp20X714077_suppl.pdf

PODCAST

  • bjgp20X714077_podcast.mp3
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care
Kirsten D Arendse, Fiona M Walter, Mark Pilling, Yin Zhou, Willie Hamilton, Garth Funston
British Journal of General Practice 11 January 2021; bjgp20X714077. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714077

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Time from presentation to pre-diagnostic chest X-ray in patients with symptomatic lung cancer: a cohort study using electronic patient records from English primary care
Kirsten D Arendse, Fiona M Walter, Mark Pilling, Yin Zhou, Willie Hamilton, Garth Funston
British Journal of General Practice 11 January 2021; bjgp20X714077. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714077
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • clinical practice guideline
  • diagnostic intervals
  • early diagnosis
  • lung cancer
  • chest X-ray

More in this TOC Section

  • GPs’ insights about discontinuing long-term antidepressant use: a qualitative study
  • The implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study
  • Does methenamine hippurate decrease urinary tract symptoms in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242