Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Systematic Review

Which patients miss appointments with general practice and why? A systematic review

Joanne Parsons, Carol Bryce and Helen Atherton
British Journal of General Practice 18 February 2021; BJGP.2020.1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.1017
Joanne Parsons
1University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol Bryce
2University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Atherton
2University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen Atherton
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Missed GP appointments have considerable time and cost implications for healthcare services. Aim: This systematic review aims to explore the rate of missed primary care appointments, what the reported reasons are for appointments being missed, and which patients are more likely to miss appointments. Design: This study reports the findings of a systematic review. Setting: Included studies report the rate or reasons of missed appointments in a primary care setting. Method: Databases were searched using a pre-defined search strategy. Eligible studies were selected for inclusion based on detailed inclusion criteria through title, abstract and full text screening. Quality was assessed on all included studies, and findings were synthesised to answer the research questions. Results: A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria for inclusion in the review. Of these, 19 reported a rate of missed appointments, with a mean rate of 15.2% and a median of 12.9% appointments being missed. Twelve studies reported a reason appointments were missed, with work or family commitments, forgetting the appointment and transportation difficulties were most commonly reported. 20 studies reported characteristics of people likely to miss appointments. Patients who were likely to miss appointments were those from minority ethnicity, low socio-demographic status and younger patients. Conclusions: Findings from this review have potential implications for targeted interventions to address missed appointments in primary care. This is the first step for clinicians being able to target interventions to reduce the rate of missed appointments.

  • General Practice
  • Missed appointments
  • Primary Care
  • Did not attend
  • Received November 12, 2020.
  • Accepted February 3, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Which patients miss appointments with general practice and why? A systematic review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Which patients miss appointments with general practice and why? A systematic review
Joanne Parsons, Carol Bryce, Helen Atherton
British Journal of General Practice 18 February 2021; BJGP.2020.1017. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Which patients miss appointments with general practice and why? A systematic review
Joanne Parsons, Carol Bryce, Helen Atherton
British Journal of General Practice 18 February 2021; BJGP.2020.1017. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practice
  • Missed appointments
  • Primary care
  • Did not attend

More in this TOC Section

  • Promoting physical activity in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review
Show more Systematic Review

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242