Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Article

Are Dutch general practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?

Julia Schellekens, Claire Houtvast, Peter Leusink, Gunilla Kleiverda and Rebecca Gomperts
British Journal of General Practice 29 April 2022; BJGP.2021.0704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0704
Julia Schellekens
1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Houtvast
2Private practice, Gouda, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claire Houtvast
  • For correspondence: clairehoutvast@gmail.com
Peter Leusink
3Women on Waves, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gunilla Kleiverda
3Women on Waves, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Gomperts
3Women on Waves, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that General Practitioners (GPs) can effectively and safely provide mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy (TOP). Dutch GPs are permitted to treat miscarriages with mifepristone and misoprostol, but in practice only guide spontaneous miscarriages. Current Dutch abortion law forbids GPs to prescribe these medications for medical TOP. Medical TOP is limited to the specialized settings of abortion clinics and hospitals. A shift to primary care is debated in the House of Representative, following the example of France and Ireland. It would improve reproductive health care and choices for women. Little is known about GPs’ willingness to provide medical TOP and miscarriage management. This study aimed to gain insight into Dutch GPs’ willingness and anticipated obstacles to prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol for medical TOP and miscarriages. This is a mixed-method study among Dutch GPs. A questionnaire provided quantitative data that was analysed using descriptive methods. Thematic analyses were performed on qualitative data collected by in-depth interviews. The questionnaire was sent to 575 GPs, the response rate was 22.1%. Of the responders, 84.3% were willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol and 58.3% were willing to provide both medical TOP and miscarriage management. 57.5% indicated a need for training. The main barriers influencing GPs’ willingness were lack of experience, knowledge, time and a restrictive abortion law. Over 80% of the respondents were willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol for medical TOP or miscarriages. Training, (online) education and a revision of the abortion law are recommended.

  • Abortion
  • Induced
  • Abortion
  • Missed
  • General Practitioners
  • Mifepristone
  • Misoprostol
  • Netherlands
  • Received December 20, 2021.
  • Accepted April 25, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Dutch general practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Are Dutch general practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?
Julia Schellekens, Claire Houtvast, Peter Leusink, Gunilla Kleiverda, Rebecca Gomperts
British Journal of General Practice 29 April 2022; BJGP.2021.0704. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0704

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Are Dutch general practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?
Julia Schellekens, Claire Houtvast, Peter Leusink, Gunilla Kleiverda, Rebecca Gomperts
British Journal of General Practice 29 April 2022; BJGP.2021.0704. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0704
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Induced
  • Missed
  • General Practitioners
  • Mifepristone
  • Misoprostol
  • Netherlands

More in this TOC Section

  • Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study
  • Diagnostic prediction models for computed tomography-confirmed acute rhinosinusitis and culture-confirmed acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in adults presenting to primary care: an individual participant data meta-analysis
  • parkrun as a tool to support public health: insights for clinicians
Show more Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242