Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study

Helen Anderson, Arabella Scantlebury, Heather Leggett, Chris Salisbury, Jonathan Benger and Joy Adamson
British Journal of General Practice 25 July 2022; BJGP.2021.0713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0713
Helen Anderson
York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York.
Roles: Research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen Anderson
Arabella Scantlebury
York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York.
Roles: Assistant professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arabella Scantlebury
Heather Leggett
York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York.
Roles: Research fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heather Leggett
Chris Salisbury
Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol.
Roles: Professor of primary health care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Salisbury
Jonathan Benger
School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Roles: Professor of emergency care
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan Benger
Joy Adamson
York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York.
Roles: Professor of surgical trials and health sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joy Adamson
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • How this fits in

    Many people attending emergency departments (EDs) could be managed by GPs and employing GPs to work in or alongside emergency departments (GPED) is a way to address increased pressure on EDs. This study highlights the benefits of GPs choosing to work in GPED roles such as professional development, sharing skills and knowledge across both contexts, and retaining GPs in some capacity within the clinical workforce. However, GPs working in GPED services expressed concerns that the GPED model may not be sustainable and may also contribute to destabilisation of core general practice. By exploring the views, motivations, and experiences of GPs choosing to work in GPED roles, this study may inform planning and implementation of both GPED services and core general practice.
    • View popup
    Box 1.

    GPED model by case sitea

    SiteGPED modelGP role
    BirchInside ED: parallelGP in ED (including investigations)
    ChestnutInside ED: parallelGP in ED (usual primary care)
    Outside ED: off-site
    HawthornInside ED: parallel (OOHs only)GP in ED (usual primary care)
    JuniperOutside ED: on-site (OOHs only)GPs either work in usual primary care role or adapt a dual role where they become involved in managing patients with ED health issues
    Inside ED: integrated
    LindenOutside ED: hospital site + off-siteGP in ED (UCC) (usual primary care)
    NutmegInside ED: parallelGP in ED (UCC) (usual primary care)
    PoplarOutside ED: on-siteGP in ED (including investigations)
    RedwoodInside ED: parallelGP in ED (including investigations)
    RowanInside ED: parallelGP in ED (usual primary care)
    TeakInside ED: parallelGP in ED (including investigations,
    Outside ED: off-siteincreased acuity)
    • ↵a Inside models — GPs co-located within ED. Can be: integrated — GPs work within the ED team managing a range of patients, or parallel — patients assessed as suitable for GP care ‘streamed’ to GP within the department. Outside models — patients assessed in ED then sent to GP outside ED, either within hospital grounds (on-site) or off hospital grounds (off-site). ED = emergency department. GPED = GPs working in or alongside EDs. OOH = GP out-of-hours service. UCC = urgent care centre.

    • View popup
    Box 2.

    Suggestions for future practice

    Sustainability of GPEDSustainability of core general practiceSustainability of both GPED and core general practice
    Offer flexibility in work patterns, for example, shift patterns, locum, and part-time work balanced with need for effective service planning and provisionSystemic change required to make general practice sustainable, for example, flexible working, collaborative working environmentSupport for portfolio careers such as working in GPED roles may allow some GPs to extend their working life, reduce early retirement and attrition, and prevent burnout
    Support GPs to broaden clinical opportunities when working in GPED services to enhance the core GP roleSupport flexibility of workload organisation, for example, consultation durationPortfolio working and novel GPED roles require structured education and support from training systems and medical royal colleges
    Support for GPs to adapt to different ways of working in GPED roles according to their career plan and aspirationsUse GPED to promote general practice to junior doctors and other healthcare professionals working in EDConsideration of strategies to prevent/limit competition for finite GP resource
    Development of strategies to reduce competition for GP resourcePotential for core general practice to ‘borrow’ learning from the positive benefits GPs experience in GPED rolesDevelop strategies that value shared learning and support for collaborative working
    Provide ‘incentives’ to work in GPED services such as support and supervision, career planningSupporting GPs to work part-time in GPED services or other portfolio working, as well as working part-time in core general practice, may assist retention of GPsDevelop the GPED role to include input into system changes, for example, streamlining primary/secondary care referral processes
    Utilise GPs as a resource to share learning and primary care philosophies with ED colleaguesGPED roles can be used as a ‘stepping stone’ for those GPs yet to make longer-term career decisionsProfessional reciprocity and broadening clinical opportunities enhances both primary and secondary care
    • ED = emergency department. GPED = GPs working in or alongside EDs.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

  • BJGP.2021.0713_suppl.pdf
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study
Helen Anderson, Arabella Scantlebury, Heather Leggett, Chris Salisbury, Jonathan Benger, Joy Adamson
British Journal of General Practice 25 July 2022; BJGP.2021.0713. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0713

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study
Helen Anderson, Arabella Scantlebury, Heather Leggett, Chris Salisbury, Jonathan Benger, Joy Adamson
British Journal of General Practice 25 July 2022; BJGP.2021.0713. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0713
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • emergency department
  • general practice
  • general practitioners
  • qualitative research

More in this TOC Section

  • Antibiotics versus no treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in residents of aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Supporting people with pain-related distress in primary care consultations: a qualitative study
  • Primary care practice and cancer suspicion during the first three COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: a qualitative study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242