Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research

Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives

Danielle C Butler, Grace Joshy, Kirsty A Douglas, Muhammad-Shahdaat Bin-Sayeed, Jennifer Welsh, Angus Douglas and Rosemary J Korda
British Journal of General Practice 28 November 2022; BJGP.2022.0351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0351
Danielle C Butler
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Danielle C Butler
  • For correspondence: danielle.butler@anu.edu.au
Grace Joshy
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Grace Joshy
Kirsty A Douglas
2 Academic Unit of General Practice, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kirsty A Douglas
Muhammad-Shahdaat Bin-Sayeed
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Muhammad-Shahdaat Bin-Sayeed
Jennifer Welsh
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer Welsh
Angus Douglas
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angus Douglas
Rosemary J Korda
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rosemary J Korda
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice in Australia underwent a rapid transition, including the rollout of population-wide telehealth, with uncertain impacts on general practitioner (GP) use and costs. Aim: To describe how use and costs of GP services changed in 2020—following the pandemic and introduction of telehealth—compared to 2019, and how this varied across population subgroups. Design and setting: Whole-of-population linked-data analysis, Australia. Method: Multi-Agency Data Integration Project data for ~19M individuals from Census 2016 were linked to Medicare data for 2019-2020. We used regression models to compare age-sex-adjusted GP use and out-of-pocket costs (OPCs) over time, overall and by sociodemographic characteristics. Results: 86% of the population visited a GP in Q2-Q4 2020 compared to 90% in Q2-Q4 2019. The mean number of face-to-face GP services per quarter declined, while telehealth services increased, with overall use of GP services in Q4 2020 similar to or higher than Q4 2019. The proportion of total GP services by telehealth stabilised at ~25% in Q4 2020. However, individuals aged 3-14 or ≥70 years and those with limited English proficiency used fewer GP services in 2020 compared to 2019, with a lower proportion by telehealth. Mean OPC-per-service was lower across all subgroups in 2020 compared to 2019. Conclusion: Introduction of widespread telehealth maintained use of GP services during the pandemic and minimised OPCs, but not for all population subgroups. This may reflect technological, social or other barriers to telehealth in these populations, as well as pandemic-related changes in healthcare use.

  • Telehealth
  • COVID-19
  • primary care
  • out-of-pocket costs
  • linked data
  • Received July 6, 2022.
  • Accepted November 18, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives
Danielle C Butler, Grace Joshy, Kirsty A Douglas, Muhammad-Shahdaat Bin-Sayeed, Jennifer Welsh, Angus Douglas, Rosemary J Korda
British Journal of General Practice 28 November 2022; BJGP.2022.0351. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0351

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives
Danielle C Butler, Grace Joshy, Kirsty A Douglas, Muhammad-Shahdaat Bin-Sayeed, Jennifer Welsh, Angus Douglas, Rosemary J Korda
British Journal of General Practice 28 November 2022; BJGP.2022.0351. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0351
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Telehealth
  • COVID-19
  • Primary care
  • out-of-pocket costs
  • linked data

More in this TOC Section

  • Free-text analysis of general practice out-of-hours (GPOOH) use by people with advanced cancer: an analysis of coded and uncoded free-text data
  • General practice-based cancer research publications: a bibliometric analysis 2013–2019
  • Patient experiences of GP-led colon cancer survivorship care: a Dutch mixed-methods evaluation
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242