Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Article

Sociodemographic Variations in the Uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Tests in Primary Care

James A Bailey, Alastair James Morton, James Jones, Caroline J Chapman, Simon Oliver, Joanne R Morling, Heetan Patel, Ayan Banerjea and David J Humes
British Journal of General Practice 1 September 2023; BJGP.2023.0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033
James A Bailey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James A Bailey
  • For correspondence: james.bailey4@nhs.net
Alastair James Morton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alastair James Morton
James Jones
1 Nottingham Colorectal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James Jones
Caroline J Chapman
4 Eastern Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caroline J Chapman
Simon Oliver
5 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne R Morling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joanne R Morling
Heetan Patel
5 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayan Banerjea
1 Nottingham Colorectal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ayan Banerjea
David J Humes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J Humes
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) usage for symptomatic patients is increasing, but variations in use by sociodemographics are unknown. We introduced FIT for symptomatic patients in November 2017. Aim: Identify whether demographics, ethnicity or social deprivation affect FIT return in symptomatic patients. Design and Setting: FIT was introduced as a triage tool in Primary Care and was mandated for all colorectal referrals (except rectal bleeding/mass) to secondary care. FIT was used, alongside full blood count and ferritin, to stratify colorectal cancer risk. Method: All referrals November 2017-December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Sociodemographic factors affecting FIT return were analysed by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 35,289 patients returned their index FIT (90.7%), 3631 (9.3%) did not. On multivariate analysis, males were less likely to return FIT (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.03-1.19). Patients over 65 were more likely to return FIT (OR 0.78 for non-return, 95%CI 0.72-0.83). Unreturned FIT was more than doubled in the most compared to the least deprived (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.99-2.43). Patients from Asian (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.58-2.10), Black (OR 1.21, 95%CI 0.98-1.49) and Mixed/Other ethnic groups (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.05-1.59) were more likely to not return FIT compared to White ethnicity. 599 colorectal cancers were detected (1.5%), 561 in those who returned a first FIT request, 38 in those who did not. Conclusion: FIT return in those suspected of having colorectal cancer varies by gender, age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation. Strategies to mitigate effects on FIT return and colorectal cancer detection should be considered as FIT usage expands.

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Faecal Immunochemical Testing
  • Inequality
  • Social Deprivation
  • Received January 15, 2023.
  • Accepted May 16, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Online First

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sociodemographic Variations in the Uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Tests in Primary Care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Sociodemographic Variations in the Uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Tests in Primary Care
James A Bailey, Alastair James Morton, James Jones, Caroline J Chapman, Simon Oliver, Joanne R Morling, Heetan Patel, Ayan Banerjea, David J Humes
British Journal of General Practice 1 September 2023; BJGP.2023.0033. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Sociodemographic Variations in the Uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Tests in Primary Care
James A Bailey, Alastair James Morton, James Jones, Caroline J Chapman, Simon Oliver, Joanne R Morling, Heetan Patel, Ayan Banerjea, David J Humes
British Journal of General Practice 1 September 2023; BJGP.2023.0033. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Faecal Immunochemical Testing
  • Inequality
  • Social Deprivation

More in this TOC Section

  • Nurse delivered Sleep Restriction Therapy for adults with Insomnia Disorder: process evaluation
  • E-health intervention for preventing recurrent ankle sprains: a randomised controlled trial in general practice
Show more Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242