<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kumpel, Z.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Referral letters — the enclosure of the general practitioner's computerized record</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1978</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1978-03-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">163-167</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">188</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The computerization of general practice records in group practices often makes it possible for a print-out of the record to be sent to hospital specialists on referral. I examined the assessments made by consultants of the value of this. While general practitioners and consultants do not agree on the content of the ideal referral letter, the addition of a computer print-out would aid about a third of consultants.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>