<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clement, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pickering, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rowlands, G</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thiru, K</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Candy, B</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Lusignan, S</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Towards a conceptual framework for evaluating primary care research networks.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">British Journal of General Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000-08-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">651-652</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">50</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">457</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We describe a conceptual framework that we have developed for evaluating primary care research networks. The framework includes objectives, process indicators, and outcome indicators. We propose the framework as a provisional model that we hope will promote further research and debate.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>