PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - B B van Drenth
AU  - M E Hulscher
AU  - J C van der Wouden
AU  - H G Mokkink
AU  - C Van Weel
AU  - R P Grol
TI  - Relationship between practice organization and cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice.
DP  - 1998 Mar 01
TA  - British Journal of General Practice
PG  - 1054--1058
VI  - 48
IP  - 428
4099  - http://bjgp.org/content/48/428/1054.short
4100  - http://bjgp.org/content/48/428/1054.full
SO  - Br J Gen Pract1998 Mar 01; 48
AB  - BACKGROUND: Research findings suggest that the level of cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice is not yet optimal. Several studies indicate a relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention at practice level and cardiovascular risk factor recording. AIM: To explore the relation between the organization of cardiovascular disease prevention and risk factor recording in general practice. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data on adherence to selected practice guidelines and on cardiovascular risk factor recording from 95 general practices. Practice guidelines were developed beforehand in a consensus procedure. Adherence was assessed by means of a questionnaire and practice observations. Risk factor recording was assessed by an audit of 50 medical records per practice. RESULTS: Factor analysis of risk factor recording revealed three dimensions explaining 76% of the variance: recording of health-related behaviour, recording of clinical parameters, and recording of medical background parameters. Adherence to the guideline 'proactively invite patients to attend for assessment of cardiovascular risk' was related to a higher recording level in all three dimensions. Practice characteristics did not show a consistent relationship to the level of risk factor recording. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the presence of a system of proactive invitation was related to the recording of cardiovascular risk factors in medical records in general practice.