<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huas, D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wallace, P</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is participation in research as an investigator an effective form of continuing medical education?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">British Journal of General Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">982-983</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">50</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">461</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuing medical education and research are a daily necessity for general practitioners (GPs). This study investigated the possibility that participation in research is an effective form of continuing medical education. Although there was an indication that some modification of GPs' knowledge and skills had occurred, it was not possible to conclude that this was entirely due to participation in research.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>