RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Difficulties in Balint groups: a qualitative study of leaders' experiences
JF British Journal of General Practice
JO Br J Gen Pract
FD British Journal of General Practice
SP 808
OP 814
DO 10.3399/bjgp10X532585
VO 60
IS 580
A1 Dorte Kjeldmand
A1 Inger Holmström
YR 2010
UL http://bjgp.org/content/60/580/808.abstract
AB Background Balint groups (BGs) are a means of enhancing competence in the physician–patient relationship and are also regarded as beneficial for GPs' mental health. However, voluntary BGs are still few, some members terminate their participation, and problems are reported in obligatory groups in residency programmes. This raises questions about possible negative aspects of BGs.Aim To examine difficulties in BGs as experienced by BG leaders.Design of study Qualitative study using interviews.Setting Eight BG leaders from five countries were interviewed.Method The interviews focused on the informants' experiences of difficulties in their groups and were analysed with a systematic text-condensation method.Results Three categories of difficulties emerged from the analysis: 1) the individual physician having needs, vulnerabilities, and defences; 2) the group (including the leader) having problems of hidden agendas, rivalries, and frames; and 3) the surrounding environment defining the conditions of the group. BGs were found to fit into modern theories of small groups as complex systems. They are submitted to group dynamics that are sometimes malicious, and are exposed to often tough environmental conditions.Conclusion Professionally conducted BGs seem to be a gentle, efficient method to train physicians, but with limitations. Participation of a member demands psychological stability and an open mind. BGs need support from the leadership of healthcare organisations in order to exist.