PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Willemjan Slort
AU  - Annette H Blankenstein
AU  - Luc Deliens
AU  - Henriëtte E van der Horst
TI  - Facilitators and barriers for GP–patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients, and end-of-life consultants
AID  - 10.3399/bjgp11X567081
DP  - 2011 Apr 01
TA  - British Journal of General Practice
PG  - e167--e172
VI  - 61
IP  - 585
4099  - http://bjgp.org/content/61/585/e167.short
4100  - http://bjgp.org/content/61/585/e167.full
SO  - Br J Gen Pract2011 Apr 01; 61
AB  - Background Effective communication is considered to be essential for the delivery of high-quality care. Communication in palliative care may be particularly difficult, and there is still no accepted set of communication skills for GPs in providing palliative care.Aim To obtain detailed information on facilitators and barriers for GP–patient communication in palliative care, with the aim to develop training programmes that enable GPs to improve their palliative care communication skills.Design of study Qualitative study with focus groups, interviews, and questionnaires.Setting GPs with patients receiving palliative care at home, and end-of-life consultants in the Netherlands.Method GP (n = 20) focus groups discussing facilitators and barriers, palliative care patient (n = 6) interviews regarding facilitators, and end-of-life consultant (n = 22) questionnaires concerning barriers.Results Facilitators reported by both GPs and patients were accessibility, taking time, commitment, and listening carefully. GPs emphasise respect, while patients want GPs to behave in a friendly way, and to take the initiative to discuss end-of-life issues. Barriers reported by both GPs and end-of-life consultants were: difficulty in dealing with former doctors' delay and strong demands from patients' relatives. GPs report difficulty in dealing with strong emotions and troublesome doctor–patient relationships, while consultants report insufficient clarification of patients' problems, promises that could not be kept, helplessness, too close involvement, and insufficient anticipation of various scenarios.Conclusion The study findings suggest that the quality of GP–patient communication in palliative care in the Netherlands can be improved. It is recommended that specific communication training programmes for GPs should be developed and evaluated.