RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impact of the GP contract on inequalities associated with influenza immunisation: a retrospective population-database analysis
JF British Journal of General Practice
JO Br J Gen Pract
FD British Journal of General Practice
SP e379
OP e385
DO 10.3399/bjgp11X583146
VO 61
IS 588
A1 Michael Norbury
A1 Neil Fawkes
A1 Bruce Guthrie
YR 2011
UL http://bjgp.org/content/61/588/e379.abstract
AB Background Influenza immunisation is recommended for all people aged ≥65 years and younger people with particular chronic diseases. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has provided new financial incentives for influenza immunisation since 2004.Aim To determine the impact of the 2004 UK General Medical Services contract on the overall uptake of, and socioeconomic inequalities associated with, influenza immunisation.Design and setting Retrospective general-practice population database analysis in 15 general practices in Scotland, UK.Method Changes in influenza-immunisation uptake for those in at-risk groups between 2003–2004 and 2006–2007 were measured, and variation in uptake examined using multilevel modelling.Results Uptake rose from 67.9% in 2003–2004 to 71.4% in 2006–2007. The largest increases were seen in those aged <65 years with chronic disease, with uptake rising from 49.6% to 58.4%, but rates remained considerably lower than in those aged ≥65 years. Differences between practices narrowed (median odds ratio [OR] for two patients randomly selected from different practices: 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.00 to 2.26) in 2003–2004 versus 1.44 (95% CI = 1.40 to 1.49) in 2006–2007. However, inequalities in uptake by patient socioeconomic status did not change: adjusted OR for most deprived versus most affluent was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.80) in 2003–2004 versus 0.72 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.76) in 2006–2007.Conclusion Overall uptake rose significantly and differences between practices narrowed considerably. However, socioeconomic and age inequalities in influenza immunisation persisted in the first 3 years of the QOF. This contrasts with other ecological analyses, which have concluded that the QOF has reduced inequalities. The impact of financial incentives on inequalities is likely to vary, and some kinds of care may require more targeted improvement activity and support.