TY - JOUR T1 - Predictors of persistent complaints after a knee injury in primary care JF - British Journal of General Practice JO - Br J Gen Pract SP - e561 LP - e566 DO - 10.3399/bjgp12X653615 VL - 62 IS - 601 AU - Harry PA Wagemakers AU - Pim AJ Luijsterburg AU - Edith M Heintjes AU - Marjolein Y Berger AU - Jan AN Verhaar AU - Bart W Koes AU - Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra Y1 - 2012/08/01 UR - http://bjgp.org/content/62/601/e561.abstract N2 - Background Prognosis of persistent complaints after knee injury is based on secondary care populations. In a primary care setting, however, no studies have addressed this issue.Aim To identify possible predictors of persistent complaints 1 year after a knee injury. These predictors are important for guiding the GP’s therapeutic management, and giving advice to patients about work and/or sports-related activities.Design and setting Primary care prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up period in five municipalities in the southwest region of the Netherlands.Method Patients who were eligible were recruited to the study by a GP research network with around 84 000 patients and 40 participating GPs. A total of 134 patients (aged 18–65 years) who consulted their GP within 5 weeks after a knee injury entered the study. Follow-up after 1 year was conducted in 122 patients. The main outcome was persistent complaints 1 year after injury; possible predictors for these complaints were obtained with a questionnaire, a physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to a standardised protocol.Results After 1 year, of the 122 available patients, 21 (17%) reported persistent complaints and 101 (83%) reported full recovery or major improvement. In this study being aged >40 years had a significant association (P<0.05) with persistent complaints (odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 30.5). Physical examination and MRI findings revealed no predictors that were associated with these complaints.Conclusion Being aged >40 years was the only determinant with a significant association with persistent complaints. As physical examination and MRI had no predictive value, they are not recommended for prognosis of persistent complaints. ER -