@article {Thorntone69, author = {Hannah V Thornton and Peter S Blair and Andrew M Lovering and Peter Muir and Alastair D Hay}, title = {Clinical presentation and microbiological diagnosis in paediatric respiratory tract infection: a systematic review}, volume = {65}, number = {631}, pages = {e69--e81}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.3399/bjgp15X683497}, publisher = {Royal College of General Practitioners}, abstract = {Background Antibiotic prescribing decisions for respiratory tract infection (RTI) in primary care could be improved if clinicians could target bacterial infections. However, there are currently no evidence-based diagnostic rules to identify microbial aetiology in children presenting with acute RTIs.Aim To analyse evidence of associations between clinical symptoms or signs and detection of microbes from the upper respiratory tract (URT) of children with acute cough.Design and setting Systematic review and meta-analysis.Method A literature search identified articles reporting relationships between individual symptoms and/or signs, and microbes detected from URT samples. Associations between pathogens and symptoms or signs were summarised, and meta-analysis conducted where possible.Results There were 9984 articles identified, of which 28 met inclusion criteria. Studies identified 30 symptoms and 41 signs for 23 microbes, yielding 1704 potential associations, of which only 226 (13\%) have presently been investigated. Of these, relevant statistical analyses were presented for 175 associations, of which 25\% were significant. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant relationships between respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detection and chest retractions (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95\% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 2.3), wheeze (pooled OR 1.7, 95\% CI = 1.5 to 2.0), and crepitations/crackles (pooled OR 1.7, 95\% CI = 1.3 to 2.2).Conclusions There was an absence of evidence for URT pathogens other than RSV. The meta-analysis identified clinical signs associated with RSV detection, suggesting clinical presentation may offer some, albeit poor, diagnostic value. Further research is urgently needed to establish the value of symptoms and signs in determining microbiological aetiology and improve targeting of antibiotics in primary care.}, issn = {0960-1643}, URL = {https://bjgp.org/content/65/631/e69}, eprint = {https://bjgp.org/content/65/631/e69.full.pdf}, journal = {British Journal of General Practice} }