TY - JOUR T1 - Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care JF - British Journal of General Practice JO - Br J Gen Pract SP - e786 LP - e793 DO - 10.3399/bjgp16X687085 VL - 66 IS - 652 AU - Mary Carter AU - Antoinette Davey AU - Christine Wright AU - Natasha Elmore AU - Jenny Newbould AU - Martin Roland AU - John Campbell AU - Jenni Burt Y1 - 2016/11/01 UR - http://bjgp.org/content/66/652/e786.abstract N2 - Background In recent years, hospitals have made use of new technologies, such as real-time feedback, to collect patient experience information. This approach is currently rarely used in primary care settings, but may provide practices with a useful tool that enables them to take prompt, focused action to improve their services.Aim To identify the factors inhibiting and enabling the implementation of real-time feedback in general practices.Design and setting Qualitative study embedded within an exploratory trial (July 2014 to February 2015) of a real-time feedback intervention targeting patient experience in general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire.Method Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) and focus groups (n = 4, total of 28 attendees) with practice staff were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically, using a framework based on constructs from normalisation process theory.Results Staff engagement with real-time feedback varied considerably, and staff made sense of real-time feedback by comparing it with more familiar feedback modalities. Effective within-team communication was associated with positive attitudes towards real-time feedback. Timing of requests for feedback was important in relation to patient engagement. Real-time feedback may offer potential as a means of informing practice development, perhaps as a component of a wider programme of capturing and responding to patients’ comments.Conclusion Successful implementation of real-time feedback requires effective communication across the practice team to engender thorough engagement. Feedback processes should be carefully introduced to fit with existing patient and practice routines. Future studies should consider making real-time feedback content relevant to specific practice needs, and support participation by all patient groups. ER -