TY - JOUR T1 - The patient, the doctor, and the patient’s loyalty: a qualitative study in French general practice JF - British Journal of General Practice JO - Br J Gen Pract SP - e810 LP - e818 DO - 10.3399/bjgp16X687541 VL - 66 IS - 652 AU - Laura Gérard AU - Mathilde François AU - Marine de Chefdebien AU - Oliver Saint-Lary AU - Alain Jami Y1 - 2016/11/01 UR - http://bjgp.org/content/66/652/e810.abstract N2 - Background The term loyalty can be defined as the attachment that characterises someone who consistent in their feelings, affections, or habits. By introducing the Declaration of General Practitioner (or preferred doctor declaration) in 2004, France adopted a formal incentive for patients to be faithful to their doctor since it entailed optimal coverage of medical care by their national health insurance There has been no research evaluating the impact of this measure and to determine the components of doctor–patient loyalty.Aim To explore what builds and maintains patients’ loyalty to their GP.Design and setting Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews close to Paris (the département of Yvelines’), France.Method Twenty-eight patients were interviewed in five surgeries of self-employed GPs with different demographics. Interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis conducted to categorise the data. Phenomenological analysis was used to analyse the transcripts.Results Patient loyalty is based mainly on trust. Trust can be reinforced by certain comforting factors such as the ability to listen, a sense of carefulness, and the quality of care. Loyalty is both a dynamic construct and a relational exchange subject to various influences. Patients find advantages in being loyal. The model of the ‘family doctor’ has always been the archetype of loyalty for several generations within one family. A GP’s inability to meet all of the patient’s requirements is not necessarily a determining factor in breaking the patient’s loyalty.Conclusion Loyalty is more complex than commonly assumed and involves dimensions of trust, listening, quality of care, availability, and familiarity. The observations drawn out from this study warrant a larger scale investigation. ER -