RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs JF British Journal of General Practice JO Br J Gen Pract FD British Journal of General Practice SP e887 OP e895 DO 10.3399/bjgp16X687565 VO 66 IS 653 A1 Frans AWM Derksen A1 Tim C olde Hartman A1 Jozien M Bensing A1 Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen YR 2016 UL http://bjgp.org/content/66/653/e887.abstract AB Background Current daily general practice has become increasingly technical and somatically oriented (where attention to patients’ feelings is decreased) due to an increase in protocol-based guidelines. Priorities in GP–patient communication have shifted from a focus on listening and empathy to task-oriented communication.Aim To explore what barriers GPs experience when applying empathy in daily practice, and how these barriers are managed.Design and setting Thirty Dutch GPs with sufficient heterogeneity in sex, age, type of practice, and rural or urban setting were interviewed.Method The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied. The verbatim transcripts were then analysed.Results According to participating GPs, the current emphasis on protocol-driven care can be a significant barrier to genuineness in communication. Other potential barriers mentioned were time pressures and constraints, and dealing with patients displaying ‘unruly behaviour’ or those with personality disorders. GPs indicated that it can be difficult to balance emotional involvement and professional distance. Longer consulting times, smaller practice populations, and efficient practice organisation were described as practical solutions. In order to focus on a patient-as-person approach, GPs strongly suggested that deviating from guidelines should be possible when necessary as an element of good-quality care. Joining intercollegiate counselling groups was also discussed.Conclusion In addition to practical solutions for barriers to behaving empathically, GPs indicated that they needed more freedom to balance working with protocols and guidelines, as well as a patient-as-person and patient-as-partner approach. This balance is necessary to remain connected with patients and to deliver care that is truly personal.