<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Senior, Tim</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Two tasks</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">British Journal of General Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018-05-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">242-242</style></pages><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.3399/bjgp18X696089</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">68</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">670</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">I have always been a little surprised to find that consultation models aren’t widely taught in Australian general practice. I always found it quite useful to have a range of ways of looking at the complex interactions between myself and the patient, ways of getting myself unstuck when a purely medical approach didn’t seem to be paying dividends.I’m not sure why the models haven’t caught on in Australia. It may be that they don’t take root in a medical system that prizes procedures over cognition. GPs here are a proud bunch, often under-appreciated by specialist colleagues and politicians alike. Consultation models are easily dismissed as an …</style></abstract></record></records></xml>