PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sharon Spooner
AU  - Jon Gibson
AU  - Kath Checkland
AU  - Anne McBride
AU  - Damian E Hodgson
AU  - Mark Hann
AU  - Imelda McDermott
AU  - Matt Sutton
TI  - Regional variation in practitioner employment in general practices in England: a comparative analysis
AID  - 10.3399/bjgp20X708185
DP  - 2020 Feb 11
TA  - British Journal of General Practice
PG  - bjgp20X708185
4099  - http://bjgp.org/content/early/2020/02/10/bjgp20X708185.short
4100  - http://bjgp.org/content/early/2020/02/10/bjgp20X708185.full
AB  - Background In recent years, UK health policy makers have responded to a GP shortage by introducing measures to support increased healthcare delivery by practitioners from a wider range of backgrounds.Aim To ascertain the composition of the primary care workforce in England at a time when policy changes affecting deployment of different practitioner types are being introduced.Design and setting This study was a comparative analysis of workforce data reported to NHS Digital by GP practices in England.Method Statistics are reported using practice-level data from the NHS Digital June 2019 data extract. Because of the role played by Health Education England (HEE) in training and increasing the skills of a healthcare workforce that meets the needs of each region, the analysis compares average workforce composition across the 13 HEE regions in EnglandResults The workforce participation in terms of full-time equivalent of each staff group across HEE regions demonstrates regional variation. Differences persist when expressed as mean full-time equivalent per thousand patients. Despite policy changes, most workers are employed in long-established primary care roles, with only a small proportion of newer types of practitioner, such as pharmacists, paramedics, physiotherapists, and physician associates.Conclusion This study provides analysis of a more detailed and complete primary care workforce dataset than has previously been available in England. In describing the workforce composition at this time, the study provides a foundation for future comparative analyses of changing practitioner deployment before the introduction of primary care networks, and for evaluating outcomes and costs that may be associated with these changes.