TY - JOUR T1 - Engagement with and delivery of the ‘parkrun practice initiative’ in general practice: a mixed methods study JF - British Journal of General Practice JO - Br J Gen Pract SP - e573 LP - e580 DO - 10.3399/bjgp20X710453 VL - 70 IS - 697 AU - Joanna Fleming AU - Carol Bryce AU - Joanne Parsons AU - Chrissie Wellington AU - Jeremy Dale Y1 - 2020/08/01 UR - http://bjgp.org/content/70/697/e573.abstract N2 - Background The parkrun practice initiative, a joint collaboration between parkrun and the Royal College of General Practitioners, was launched to encourage general practices to improve the health and wellbeing of patients and staff through participating in local 5 km parkrun events. Why and how practices engage with the initiative is unknown.Aim To investigate engagement with and delivery of the parkrun practice initiative in general practice.Design and setting Mixed methods study conducted from April–July 2019 comprising an online survey of all registered parkrun practices, and interviews and a focus group with practice staff in the West Midlands.Method The designated contacts at 780 registered parkrun practices were invited to complete an online survey. A purposive sample of parkrun practice staff and non-registered practice staff took part either in semi-structured interviews or a focus group, with transcripts analysed thematically.Results Of the total number of parkrun practices, 306 (39.2%) completed the survey. Sixteen practice staff (from nine parkrun practices and four non-registered practices) took part in either semi-structured interviews (n = 12) or a focus group (n = 4). Key motivators for becoming a parkrun practice were: to improve patient and staff health and wellbeing, and to become more engaged with the community and enhance practice image. Practices most commonly encouraged patients, carers, and staff to take part in parkrun and displayed parkrun flyers and posters. Challenges in implementing activities included lack of time (both personal and during consultations) and getting staff involved. Where staff did engage there were positive effects on morale and participation. Non-registered practices were receptive to the initiative, but had apprehensions about the commitment involved.Conclusion Practices were keen to improve patient and staff health. Addressing time constraints and staff support needs to be considered when implementing the initiative. ER -