<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">O'Flanagan, P.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The work of an accident and emergency department</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1976</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1976-01-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54-60</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">162</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In a six month period 2,379 new patients were treated in a designated major accident centre. Of these cases two thirds (67·9 per cent) were thought to be appropriate for management by general practitioners. I suggest that these cases are properly treated in an accident and emergency department and that these departments should be developed as part of the primary health care teams.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>