Table 2

Effect of the intervention on weight and waist circumference.

Structured supportPedometer
NoYesNoYes
Participants, n53505548
Weight, kg
 Baseline visit, mean (SD)94.13 (16.06)101.0 (18.60)97.84 (17.36)97.03 (18.03)
 Final visit, mean (SD)92.96 (16.13)97.03 (18.45)95.31 (16.41)94.51 (18.50)
 Change: final—follow-up, mean (SD)−1.17 (3.84)−3.96 (3.47)−2.53 (3.88)−2.52 (3.98)
 Adjusted differencea, mean (95% CI)−2.63 (−4.06 to −1.20)−0.11 (−1.52 to 1.30)
Weight loss, %
 Final visit, mean (SD)−1.20 (4.06)−3.96 (3.40)−2.42 (3.96)−2.69 (4.05)
 Adjusted differencea, mean (95% CI)−2.78 (−4.25 to −1.30)−0.36 (−1.82 to 1.10)
Weight change, n (%)
 Lost ≥5%10 (18.9)17 (34.0)13 (23.6)14 (29.2)
 Lost 0–5%23 (43.4)27 (54.0)29 (52.7)21 (43.8)
 Gained weight20 (37.7)6 (12.0)13 (23.6)13 (27.1)
Waist circumferenceb, cm
 Baseline visit, mean (SD)108.0 (11.15)113.5 (15.11)110.1 (13.05)111.2 (13.94)
 Final visit, mean (SD)106.6 (12.15)110.3 (15.62)108.1 (12.91)108.6 (15.23)
 Change: final—follow-up, mean (SD)−1.41 (4.68)−3.19 (3.50)−1.99 (3.66)−2.57 (4.82)
 Adjusted differencea, mean (95% CI)−1.80 (−3.39 to −0.20)−0.84 (−2.42 to 0.73)
  • a Difference in change between the intervention and its control group adjusted for age, sex, value at baseline, and the other intervention.

  • b Value for waist circumference missing for one person. Negative differences represent a favourable outcome.