Reference numbera | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Research question | 19 | 20 | 21 | 1 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 29 | 28 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 12 | 33 | 34 | 35 |
Did the article describe an important clinical problem examined via a clearly formulated question? | ± | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ± | ± | + | + | ± | + | ± | ± | + | + |
Was the qualitative approach appropriate? | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ± | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Sampling method | |||||||||||||||||||
Was the sampling strategy clearly defined? | – | ± | ± | + | – | ± | + | – | ± | ± | ± | ± | ± | + | + | + | – | + | + |
Was the sampling strategy and size justified? | – | ± | – | ± | – | ± | + | – | – | ± | ± | ± | + | + | ± | + | – | – | ± |
Was the sampling strategy appropriate? | – | – | – | + | ± | ? | + | – | + | + | ± | ± | + | + | ± | + | ? | ± | + |
Is it clear why some participants chose not to take part? | – | – | ± | ± | – | – | ± | – | – | NA | – | – | – | NA | – | – | – | – | + |
Have the characteristics of included subjects been clearly defined? | – | ± | – | ± | – | – | + | – | – | ± | + | + | + | – | ± | + | + | + | ± |
Data collection | |||||||||||||||||||
Was the setting justified? | ± | + | ± | + | ? | ± | + | ± | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ± | + | + |
Were the methods used for collecting data described in enough detail? | ± | + | ± | + | ± | – | – | – | + | ± | + | + | + | + | – | + | ± | – | ± |
Were the data collection methods reliable and verifiable? | ± | + | ± | + | ± | – | + | ? | + | ± | + | ± | – | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Were observations taken in a range of circumstances (for example, at different times)? | – | NA | ? | NA | – | ± | + | NA | NA | – | – | – | ? | – | – | + | NA | – | NA |
Relationship between researcher and participants | |||||||||||||||||||
Was the researcher's perspective/role described? | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | ± | – | + | + | – | + | ± | – | – | – | + |
Was the researcher's perspective/role likely to lead to potential bias or influence? | ? | ? | – | ? | ? | ? | ± | ? | ± | ? | ± | ± | – | – | ± | ? | ? | ? | ± |
Do the researchers state how the research was explained to the participants? | – | + | – | ± | – | – | + | – | – | ± | + | + | + | ? | – | – | ± | – | – |
Data analysis | |||||||||||||||||||
Is it clear how the categories/themes were derived from the data? | – | + | ± | + | – | – | – | ± | + | + | + | + | ± | + | ± | ± | ± | + | ± |
Were steps taken to test the credibility of the findings? | – | – | – | ± | – | – | – | – | – | + | ± | ± | – | ± | – | + | ? | ± | + |
Were all the data taken into account in the analysis? | – | + | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | + | – | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Were negative or discrepant results fully addressed, or just ignored? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ± | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | + | – | ? | ± |
Do the results address the research question? | + | + | + | + | ± | + | ± | ± | + | + | ± | ± | ± | + | + | + | ± | + | ± |
Is sufficient data presented to support the findings? | ± | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | ± | ± | ± | + | + | ± | + | ± | – | ± |
Do the researchers explain how the data presented in the paper were selected from the original sample? | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ± | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
Is it possible to determine the sources of data presented? | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | ± | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – |
Conclusions | |||||||||||||||||||
Are the conclusions justified by the results? | ± | ± | ± | + | ± | ? | ± | ± | + | ± | ± | ± | + | + | ± | ± | + | ± | ± |
Have alternative explanations for the results been explored and discounted? | – | – | ± | – | – | – | – | – | – | ± | ± | ± | – | – | ± | ± | – | – | – |
Were the limitations of the study discussed? | – | + | ± | – | – | – | – | – | + | ± | ± | – | ± | + | – | – | – | + | – |
Are the findings of the study transferable to other clinical settings? | ? | ? | ± | ? | – | ? | – | ? | – | ± | – | – | ? | – | ± | ? | ? | – | + |
+ item properly addressed; ± item partially addressed; – item not properly addressed; ? Unclear/can't tell/not stated; NA Not applicable.