Table 4

Psychological and knowledge-based outcomes and acceptability of included studies

Author, yearInterventionOutcome measureParticipants analysedResultsAceptabilitynotes
Mathews et al21Health clinic one-to-one CHD service with optional community activitiesPsychological motivational stage of change in relation to CHD and diabetes control precontemplation/contemplation/preparation/action/maintenance)137Psychological motivational stagea
(a) % increased motivational stage: +50
(b) % decreased motivational stage: -21
(c) % showed no change: 29
Qualitative research showed project was highly valued, reported elsewhere26N/A
Rush et al22Group physical activity and diet education sessionsN/A20 female
21 male
N/AAnecdotally reported that changes were adopted by others in the community group and wider familiesN/A
Williams and Sultan23Group healthyeating and exercise classesN/A13N/ANine women recommended N/the group to friends. Link worker and word of mouth were the most frequent recruitment methods. Women attended for weight loss and social reasons. Barriers to attendance included reluctance to walk to the group (winter months time, fear of walking alone) and prioritising the needs of other family members. Exercise was a popular aspect of group. Those with higher BMIs were more likely to say they would reattend. The bilingual link worker was particularly valued as seven of the 13 women wished to be interviewed in their own language.N/A
Hawthorne and Tomlinson24Flashcard, one-to-one diabetes health educationPsychological
(1) finds it hard to refuse food at social events (%)
(2) can choose correct food at weddings (%)
Knowledge(1) agrees importance of diet to diabetes prevention (%)
(2) correctly identifies different food values (%)
106
interventions
86 controls
Psychological
(1) finds it hard to refuse food at social events: % change intervention group: +10, baseline 73, % change control group: +5, baseline 69
(2) can choose correct food at weddings: % change intervention group: +14, baseline 64, % change control group: -1.9, baseline 63
Knowledge
(1) agrees the importance of diet to diabetes prevention: % change intervention group: +20, baseline 74, % change control group: +6, baseline 76
(2) correctly identifies different food values: % change intervention group: +20 (ANOVA-adjusted pre-post difference 11.8) baseline 51, % change control group +1.5, baseline 58
Most participants rated the intervention positively, liked the bilingual link worker's sensitive approach, valued the information, and felt empowered to control diabetes. Two patients wanted videos or audiotapes; some wanted to keep the flashcards to use when shoppingDetails of ‘different food values’ not reported P-value reported
  • P< 0.01. CHD = coronary heart disease. N/A = not applicable.