Table 2

Narrative summary of other studies considered in depth but not contributing quantitative data.

Brief referenceSampleType of studyInterventionOutcomeNotes on inclusion
Binik YM, et al. Live and learn. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181: 371–376.37n = 87 intervention; n = 92 standard education; n = 25 ‘not part of education’A randomised study on 204 patients with advanced CKD (not yet on renal replacement)Enhanced or standard educational package predominantly nurse delivered. Education was directed towards preparation for dialysis, and involved an individually administered slide presentation and bookletA rising creatinine of >350 µmol/l was required inclusion. The setting was nephrology clinics in Canada. Those that received the enhanced and standard packages started dialysis after 14.9 ± 12.4 and 10.3 ± 11.8 months respectivelyDid not include blood pressure, so could not be included with the other quantitative analysis
Jaber LA, et al. Pharmaceutical care. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30(3): 238–243.38n = 17 intervention; n = 22 controlA randomised controlled study in diabetes (n = 532, predominantly older black females with type 2 diabetes)Patient and physician education by a pharmacist. Education was provided on diabetes, medications, diet, exercise, glucose monitoring, and self-adjustment of hypoglycaemic regimesImprovements in glycated haemoglobin found. No improvement in blood pressure or renal functionNo direct measures of renal function were available, mean creatinine was 88 µmol/l. No usable data (baseline and post-intervention blood pressure reported but no standard error)
Mazzuca SA, et al. Diabetes education study. Diabetes Care 1986; 9(1): 1–10.39n = 125, 134, and 138 for intervention groups; n = 135 controlRandom allocation into a factorial design of control, patient, physician, or patient and physician intervention groups. Subjects predominantly black older females with type 2 diabetesIntensive patient education, which was formalised and didactic, providing a systematic programme of diabetes education and delivered by a specialist multidisciplinary team; physician education from an expert; or bothReduction in fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobinNo direct measures of renal function were available, mean creatinine 88 µmol/l. No usable data (baseline and post-intervention blood pressure reported but no standard error)
McGhee SM, et al. Coordinating and standardizing long-term care. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44(387): 441–445.29n = 277 outpatient care; n = 277 shared care; n = 277 nurse practitioner careRandomised controlled trialCompares different types of care: either standard outpatient care or shared general practice-hospital care, whereby a hospital-based database generates an annual record on each enrolled patient for the GP and a patient-held record for the patient, including a prompt to attend for a review with the GP; overall responsibility for the patient's care lies with the GP, and the outcomes of the review are returned to the registry so further specialist recommendations can be made where appropriateProcess measures of review and wish to continue with care offeredDid not include blood pressure results or other indication that patients had CKD
New JP, et al. Measuring clinical performance. Diabetologia 2000; 43(7): 836–843.40n = 6544 patients with diabetesObservational studyBefore and after effect of introducing an information systemAll categories of monitoring improvedComparison of non-contemporaneous groups makes linking cause and effect difficult