Table 3

Between-group comparisons of patient satisfaction by condition.

AreasStatementsPatient conditions/groupIntervention median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score)Control median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score)Difference (intervention — control) in mean transformed satisfaction score (95% CI)P-value
Collection processI would rather have blood taken by a finger prick than by needle in my armAll conditions7.8 (0.92)5.1 (1.64)−0.73 (−0.89 to −0.57)<0.001
Anticoagulant therapy8.7 (0.36)5.0 (1.60)−1.24 (−1.49 to −0.98)<0.001
Diabetes7.8 (0.87)5.9 (1.46)−0.59 (−0.80 to −0.39)<0.001
Hyperlipidaemia7.7 (0.98)5.0 (1.68)−0.70 (−0.87 to −0.53)<0.001
Confidence in the processLaboratories have better hygiene than point-of-care testingAll conditions4.3 (1.65)4.6 (2.07)−0.43 (−0.62 to −0.23)<0.001
Anticoagulant therapy3.4 (1.41)4.8 (2.00)−0.59 (−0.87 to −0.30)<0.001
Diabetes4.3 (1.71)4.6 (2.09)−0.39 (−0.67 to −0.11)0.007
Hyperlipidaemia4.3 (1.66)4.7 (2.09)−0.43 (−0.63 to −0.23)<0.001
Confidence in the resultsI have confidence in the information given by my GP or practice regarding my pathology test resultAll conditions9.0 (0.06)8.9 (0.18)−0.12 (−0.21 to −0.03)0.010
Anticoagulant therapy9.1 (−0.05)8.9 (0.12)−0.16 (−0.32 to −0.01)0.039
Diabetes9.1 (−0.01)8.9 (0.18)−0.18 (−0.32 to −0.04)0.010
Hyperlipidaemia8.9 (0.08)8.9 (0.20)−0.12 (−0.21 to −0.02)0.018
ConvenienceNot having to travel to an outside laboratory would be convenientAll conditions8.9 (0.17)8.7 (0.36)−0.20 (−0.34 to −0.05)0.009
Anticoagulant therapy9.0 (0.04)8.7 (0.37)−0.33 (−0.58 to −0.07)0.012
Diabetes8.9 (0.14)8.8 (0.33)−0.19 (−0.36 to −0.01)0.033
Hyperlipidaemia8.8 (0.20)8.5 (0.38)−0.18 (−0.34 to −0.03)0.021
CostOutside pathology laboratories involves extra time and transport costsAll conditions8.5 (0.44)8.6 (0.39)0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23)0.51
Anticoagulant therapy8.7 (0.38)8.8 (0.42)−0.04 (−0.33 to 0.24)0.76
Diabetes8.5 (0.41)8.6 (0.35)0.06 (−0.13 to 0.26)0.54
Hyperlipidaemia8.4 (0.46)8.5 (0.41)0.05 (−0.12 to 0.22)0.56
Disease managementHaving immediate feedback of the test result for my condition was important as it allowed/would allow me to discuss the management of my condition with my GPAll conditions9.0 (0.12)8.7 (0.30)−0.18 (−0.30 to −0.06)0.003
Anticoagulant therapy9.2 (−0.10)9.0 (0.27)−0.37 (−0.59 to −0.15)<0.001
Diabetes9.1 (−0.00)8.8 (0.25)−0.26 (0.41 to −0.11)<0.001
Hyperlipidaemia9.0 (0.17)8.6 (0.34)−0.17 (−0.29 to −0.05)0.006
I am/would be more motivated to look after my condition because of regular point-of-care testingAll conditions8.9 (0.29)8.2 (0.64)−0.36 (−0.49 to −0.22)<0.001
Anticoagulant therapy9.1 (0.11)8.6 (0.59)−0.48 (−0.70 to −0.25)<0.001
Diabetes9.0 (0.22)8.2 (0.59)−0.37 (−0.55 to −0.20)<0.001
Hyperlipidaemia8.9 (0.32)8.2 (0.66)−0.34 (−0.49 to −0.19)<0.001
Point-of-care testing strengthened/would strengthen my relationship with my GPAll conditions8.3 (0.52)8.1 (0.72)−0.20 (−0.35 to −0.05)0.010
Anticoagulant therapy8.7 (0.37)8.4 (0.65)−0.28 (−0.52 to −0.04)0.024
Diabetes8.7 (0.41)8.3 (0.66)−0.25 (−0.43 to −0.06)0.010
Hyperlipidaemia8.3 (0.55)8.0 (0.75)−0.20 (−0.35 to −0.05)0.008
  • Note: a lower transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement except for the hypothesis relating to confidence in the process, where a higher transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement.