Table 4

Sensitivity/specificity, positive/negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio (with 95% CI) of the Framingham risk score and Cambridge diabetes risk score for the prediction of CVD events.

Cut-off pointPercent of the populationSensitivity, % (95% CI)Specificity, (95% CI)Positive predictive value, % (95% CI)Negative predictive value, % (95% CI)Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)
Framingham score
 risk 0.3015.241.4 (39.4 to 43.5)87.8 (87.3 to 88.3)27.7 (26.2 to 29.2)93.0 (92.6 to 93.4)3.40 (3.19 to 3.62)
 risk 0.2030.465.7 (63.7 to 67.7)73.6 (73.0 to 74.2)21.9 (20.9 to 22.9)95.0 (94.7 to 95.4)2.49 (2.40 to 2.59)
 risk 0.1542.979.3 (77.5 to 81.0)61.2 (60.5 to 61.8)18.7 (17.9 to 19.5)96.3 (96.0 to 96.6)2.04 (1.99 to 2.10)
Cambridge score
 score 0.3024.448.9 (46.8 to 51.0)78.3 (77.7 to 78.9)20.3 (19.2 to 21.4)93.2 (92.8 to 93.5)2.26 (2.15 to 2.37)
 score 0.2035.562.2 (60.1 to 64.2)a67.5 (66.8 to 68.1)a17.7 (16.9 to 18.6)94.1 (93.7 to 94.4)1.91 (1.84 to 1.99)
 score 0.1543.270.9 (68.9 to 72.7)a59.9 (59.2 to 60.6)16.6 (15.9 to 17.4)94.8 (94.4 to 95.2)1.77 (1.71 to 1.82)
  • a Significant difference compared with a 0.20 cut off using the Framingham score. McNemar's Test. P < 0.001. CVD = cardiovascular disease.