Table 4

Positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the simple traffic light grading for any fibrosis or cirrhosis in the model development cohorta

SettingParameterPredictive valueFibrosisCirrhosis
STLSimple TL
Hospital setting prior probability: cirrhosis 39%, fibrosis 82%RedPPV0.960.69
Red/amberPPV0.880.46
GreenNPV0.500.97
Low prevalence community prior probability: cirrhosis 4%, fibrosis 8%RedEst PPV0.310.13
Red/amberEst PPV0.120.05
GreenEst NPV0.981.00
Higher prevalence community prior probability: cirrhosis 10%, fibrosis 20%RedEst PPV0.570.27
Red/amberEst PPV0.290.13
GreenEst NPV0.950.99
mSTLModified TL
Hospital setting prior probability: cirrhosis 39%, fibrosis 82%RedPPV0.990.73
Red/amberPPV0.910.48
GreenNPV0.590.99
Low prevalence community prior probability: cirrhosis 4%, fibrosis 8%RedEst PPV0.630.15
Red/amberEst PPV0.170.04
GreenEst NPV0.991.00
Higher prevalence community prior probability: cirrhosis 10%, fibrosis 20%RedEst PPV0.840.31
Red/amberEst PPV0.380.13
GreenEst NPV0.961.00
  • a As the prevalence of fibrosis/cirrhosis in a primary care population with suspected liver disease was not known, estimated PPV (Est PPV) and NPV (Est NPV) values were calculated for a range of prevalences: fibrosis (8–20%) and cirrhosis (4–10%). These ranges of risk might be expected in patients with harmful alcohol consumption or known fatty liver and steatohepatitis.