Appendix 3

Articles included in the review

First authorCitationSampleAimResearch methods usedKey FindingsWeight of Evidence*
Black22J Gerontol Soc Work 2004;43:13 1–4629 social workers in 6 hospitals in upstate New York, US.To examine social workers’ advance directive communication with hospitalised elderly patientsQuestionnaire
  • Social workers play an active role in advance directive discussions

  • They reported the time they spent was inadequate

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Black27Home Health Care Serv Q 2007;26:41–5827 case managers across Florida, USTo explore case managers perceptions of facilitators and barriers to advance care planning practices.Focus groups
  • 15/27 case managers indicated clients willingly discussed future care plans

  • Time constraints of case management.

  • Lack of available immediate family.

  • Families were sometimes “in denial”, “unrealistic” “dysfunctional”

  • 16/27 said their proficiency in ACP was an issue.

  • Many said dementia limited communication

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Bradley10J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:12 35–41.600 residents admitted between 1990 and 1994 to 6 nursing homes in Connecticut, USTo measure the frequency nursing home residents discuss with clinicians their wishes for future treatment and to assess the influence of the PSDA.Review of nursing home medical records
  • 28.5% of residents had at least one discussion of future treatment wishes documented

  • This had increased since the implementation of the PSDA from 20.3% in 1990 to 36.7% in 1994).

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Carrese21Brit Med J 2002;324:1 25–720 chronically ill housebound patients over 75 from Baltimore USTo understand how elderly patients think about and approach future illness and the end of life.Semi-structured interviews.
  • 16/20 were reluctant to think about or plan for the future.

  • Many preferred to “cross that bridge” of decision making only when had to

  • Felt planning couldn’t be successful because of uncertainty over the future

  • Some felt matters to be in “good hands”

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Clarke34J Pain Symptom Manag 2010;40:85 7–6974 people older people, informal caregivers and community group representative s from across UKTo explore older people’s concerns about end-of-life issues.Focus groups
  • Only three described having made a living will.

  • One said her family were unwilling to talk

  • Some preferred not to talk to their families about death.

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall Low

Damato11N J Med 1993;90:21 5–20.86 community-dwelling senior citizens from Jersey City, USTo determine knowledge and interest in advance directives and attitudes towards end of life care.Questionnaire
  • 28% discussed terminal care with family but only 4% put wishes in writing and only 2/86 discussed with their physician

  • 71% indicated desire to prepare instructions in advance

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall Low

Froggatt35Palliative Med 2009;23:33 2–8213 managers of care homes in North West and South West EnglandTo describe current Advance Care Planning practices in English care homes for older people.Questionnaire and telephone interview
  • 89% recommended advanced care planning

  • Managers identified barriers to discussions include physical problems (62%), dementia (81%), families (51%), staff confidence (66%) and communication (40%).

  • Challenges implementing wishes include other health professionals (GPs, district nurses) & other hospitals.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall Low

Gamble12Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2 77–80.75 elderly people in rural eastern North CarolinaTo explore the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of elderly persons regarding living wills.Questionnaire
  • 81% would like to discuss end of life care with their doctor but only 11% had.

  • 79% thought these issues should be discussed when a person was well. 20% thoughts these discussions should happen when someone was 50 years.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Golden17Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2009;26:13–7.1569 home-bound but nursing home eligible older adults in Florida.To study the prevalence of specific barriers that prevent home-bound older adults from obtaining advance directives.Interviews
  • 66.2% had an advance directive

  • Of the 530 who didn’t almost 60% of the barriers consisted of the answer “never thought of it”, “chose not to execute” or “do not want to think about a negative topic”.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Medium

Gordon13Arch Intern Med 1999;159:7 01–4.5117 people aged over 65 years.To find the proportion of seniors who had been asked about their end of life care preferences by a clinician & had completed an advance directiveQuestionnaire
  • One third reported having an advance directive on file but only 15% talked with a clinician about end of life care preferences.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Johnston28Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1 025–30.329 adults age 19 to 94 years 282 resident & 272 practicing physicians at 8 primary care clinics across Eastern and Mid-Western USTo assess the opinions of Primary Care Patients and Physicians on discussions on Advance DirectivesQuestionnaire
  • The majority of patients & physicians agreed it is the responsibility of the physician to initiate discussions.

  • 91% agreed that AD should be discussed before patients are extremely ill

  • The patients believed the discussions should occur earlier than the physicians

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Malcomson14J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009;21:18–23.20 healthy 60–94 year olds Massachusetts USTo explored the perspective of healthy elders to advance care planning.Focus groups & questionnaire.
  • Only 20% reported having an advance care planning conversation

  • Participants expressed comfort even enthusiasm for discussing end of life preferences.

  • Healthcare providers should initiate discussions when a patient is relatively well.

  • Barriers identified include time, an emphasis on treatment and cure and a lack of comfort among family, friends & providers.

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Med

  • Overall: Low

Markson23J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:39 9–406.653 physicians across USInvestigates how much experience physicians have had discussing and following advance preferences and how physicians perceive their role in the advance decision making processQuestionnaire
  • 79% had discussed advance preferences with at least one patient

  • 82% felt helping patients chose advance preferences was an important part of their responsibilities

  • Most didn’t feel conversations were particularly stressful

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

McCarth15J Geront A-Biol 2008;63:95 1–9.220 community dwelling elders all over 80 years old USTo describe advance care planning, health care preferences and health perceptions in a very elderly sample.Interview
  • 69% reported discussing their EOL medical care with someone but only 17% discussed their wishes with a physician or health care provider.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Low

  • Overall:Medium

Moore16J Gerontol Soc Work 1999;31:21–39.20 low income community dwelling senior adults in relatively good health age 58–78 years in New York State USTo explore factors that influence an elder’s decision to complete an advance directiveInterview
  • Only 1/20 had discussed an advance directive with a doctor.

  • Majority would be comfortable if doctor raised an advance directive during a routine visit

  • 8/20 said family reluctant to discuss issues as didn’t want to recognise decline.

  • A) Low

  • B) Medium

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Morrison24Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2 311–8.277 residents and attending physicians at a large New York Hospital, USTo determine the impact of five proposed barriers to physicians using advance directives.Questionnaire
  • 40% of physicians hadn’t discussed advance directives with a patient in the last month

  • Barriers included physicians questions about appropriateness, their lack of understanding, lack of comfort & time constraint.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Palker18Nurse Pract 1995;20:7–8, 13, 17–8, passim.104 nursing home residents, South Eastern USTo determine the prevalence of advance directives among residents of a Nursing Home, to identify barriers to documentation and to explore death anxiety.Review of nursing home records plus interview with 17 residents
  • 52% had as least one advance directive

  • 13/17 didn’t know what an advance directive was & didn’t have one.

  • 4/17 had an advance directive &gave largely practical reasons for preparing it

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Pfeifer29J Gen Intern Med 1994;9:82–8.43 primary care physicians and 47 ambulatory patients in 8 cities across USTo identify primary care patients and physicians attitudes to discussions of end of life medical care.Interviews.
  • Patient preference for discussions in an honest & straight-forward manner.

  • Holding discussions & making decisions early outweighed any discomfort over content.

  • Physicians felt it was their responsibility to initiate discussions but were uncomfortable with early discussions citing risks to patient’s hope.

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Samsi31Health Soc Care Comm 2011;19:52–9.37 adults over 50 years in UKTo explore experiences, opinions and attitudes of older adults living in community in the context of the Mental Capacity Act.Interviews
  • Although a large proportion recognised the benefits of planning they were keen to postpone it until they were older, in worse health or it was “more appropriate”

  • Some were unsure they could rely on their GP, reporting not always seeing the same GP

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Schonfeld25Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2012;29:26 0–7.Primary care physicians at University of Nebraska Medical Centre, CanadaTo explore differences between end-of-life conversations with patients /families with multiple co-morbidities versus a single, terminal diagnosis.Focus groups
  • 46.9% had initiated end of life conversations where diagnosis was unspecified

  • Overwhelming felt EOL conversations more difficult with multiple co-morbidities.

  • Rely on physical and social cues to prompt discussions

  • Lack of clear threshold or prompting event a barrier

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Medium

Seymour26Soc Sci Med 2004;59:57–68.32 individuals from older people’s community groups in Sheffield UKTo explore older people’s views on advance statements and the role these might play in end of life care decisions.Focus groups
  • Recognition of opportunity advance statements offered to address care & treatment issues before cognitive impairment.

  • Perceived risk of “leaving it too late”

  • Most envisaged problems making decisions for future situations that were difficult to imagine

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Med

  • Overall: Low

Stelter19Arch Intern Med 1992;152:9 54–9.214 people over 65 years attending senior centres in Midwest US.To learn the reasons why so few people had completed living willsQuestionnaire
  • 15% had completed a living will. 66% without one had planned to complete one.

  • 94% believe planning for the future is important.

  • 61% wanted to discuss living wills with a physician

  • 84% reported comfortable talking about the end of life

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Stewart20Age Ageing 2011;40:33 0–4.Staff & families from 34 homes for older people in London, UK.To explore views on advance care planning in care homes for older people.Interviews
  • Staff felt ACP promoted respect for residents’ wishes and aided their treatment decisions.

  • Discussions should start early, in gradual stages before the onset of serious health problems.

  • Barriers include lack of capacity, unforeseen medical scenarios, and the reluctance of some residents and staff to discuss end of life issues

  • A) Medium

  • B) Medium

  • C) Medium

  • Overall:Medium

White32J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2005;17:14–20.13 new residents at a long-term care facility who had signed an advance directive in Midwest US.Explore experiences of residents who had signed an advance directive on admission to a long-term care facility and apply author developed model.Interviews
  • Sample had signed an advance directive on moving to care facility, 45% had consulted their physician regarding their advance directive.

  • Need time and information to make decision.

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

Winland-Brown33Adv Pract Nurs Q 1998;4:36–40.17 people over 65 with no formal advance directive Florida, USTo understand older people’s reasons for not having formalized their end-of-life decisions.Interview
  • Living in & accepting the present valued over fear of death

  • “If I ever have a terminal illness, I’ll think about advance directives.”

  • “In God’s hands”

  • Confidence family will fulfil wishes

  • A) Low

  • B) Low

  • C) Medium

  • Overall: Low

Zronek30JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul 1999;1:23–8.51 people over 60 years with an advance directive prior to hospital admission in Mid-West USTo examine patients’ beliefs and level of understanding of the advance directives they had completed.Survey
  • Most felt well informed about advance directives

  • Benefits of advance directives include ensuring wishes will be heard & assisting family in making decisions

  • A) Medium

  • B) Low

  • C) Low

  • Overall: Low

  • * Gough’s “Weight of evidence criteria”

  • Papers are assessed on four criteria:

  • 1. Coherence & integrity of the evidence in its own terms

  • 2. Appropriateness of form of evidence for answering review question

  • 3. Relevance of the evidence for answering review question

  • 4. Overall assessment of study contribution to answering review question (low, medium or high)

  • Criteria 1 involved an attempt to assess the risk of bias within individual studies. The weightings of each paper are shown in the final column of Table 1 with the weighting given for overall assessment of study contribution (criterion 4) in bold.