Table 1.

Methodological details of individual randomised controlled trials included (outcome data shown in Figure 3).

StudyChronic pain populationTotal NControl groupYates Quality Score (range 0–35)Minimum to define completionDrop-out from programme, %No follow-up data, %Powered to detect effectITTStatistically significant results, n /outcomes measured, N
EconomicClinicalHumanistic
Astin 200324Fibromyalgia128Education16Not stated18.8 (I)50 (I)
32.8 (C)
No
49 (C)
No0/70/40/2
Brown 201325Chronic musculoskeletal pain40Standard care20Not stated<3 sessions: 15 (I)20 (I)
25 (C)
NoNoN/A0/34/5
Esmer 201026Failed back surgery syndrome40Waiting list16Not statedLost before 12 wks: 21 (I), 24 (C)21 (I)
52 (C)
NoNo1/12/21/2
Morone 200927Mixed aetiology40Education284 sessions20 (I)20 (I)
5 (C)
No
5 (C)
NoN/A0/31/9
Morone 200828Mixed aetiology37Waiting list26Not stated32 (I)37 (I)
6 (C)
No
6 (C)
YesN/A(C1)0/30/6
Plews-Ogan200518Chronic musculoskeletal pain302 control groups:
Massage (C1)
Standard care (C2)
10Not stated50 (I)
10 (C1)
40 (I)
10 (C1)
20 (C2)
NoNoN/A0/20/2
Pradhan 200729Rheumatoid arthritis63Waiting list25Not statedNot stated10–19 (I)
0–12.5 (C)
NoNoN/A0/30/2
Schmidt 201119Fibromyalgia1772 control groups:
Education, relaxation and stretching (C1)
Waiting list (C2)
294 sessions<2 sessions
9 (I)
5 (C1)
14 (I)
8 (C1)
12 (C2)
YesYesN/A2/71/3
Weissbecker 200223 and Sephton 200722Fibromyalgia91Waiting list214 sessions<4 sessions
18 (I)
27 (SOC) (I)
20 (I)
38 (SOC) (C)
33 (C)
YesNo (SOC)
Yes
N/A2/30/1
Wong 201130Mixed aetiology99Multidisciplinary pain intervention (mainly educational)31>4 sessions<5 sessions
20 (I)
12 (C)
14 (I)
6 (C)
YesYes0/10/110/2
Zautra 200817Rheumatoid arthritis1442 control groups:
CBT for pain (C1)
Education (C2)
27Not stated2 (I)
4 (C1)
0 (C2)
8 (I)
4 (C1)
2 (C2)
YesNoN/A1/72/3
  • Bold text = significant. C = control. CBT = cognitive behavioural therapy. ITT = intention to treat. I = invervention. N/A = not applicable. SOC = sense of coherence